#6145

9urp5

2003-06-10 22:01

I thought that Quake 4 was going to be a sequel to Quake 2, and not completely multiplayer... ...this smells funny

0 0

#6146

karlotta

2003-06-10 22:41

And i thought Rogue was making Q4 not ID......

0 0

#6147

digitalwanderer

2003-06-10 23:58

I was under the impression that Quake4 was in the capable hands of Raven....but I could be wrong. (When did you start hanging here Karlotta? ;) )

0 0

#6148

9urp5

2003-06-11 00:04

ditto

0 0

#6149

Trik

2003-06-11 01:38

They probably chose ATI because ATI can get more performance for less power requirments and less heat byproduct.

0 0

#6150

apathy

2003-06-11 01:50

Either way I just hope Q4 is better than Q3 was, at least get some balance to the physics and weaponry this time...

0 0

#6151

thomas997

2003-06-11 02:19

exactly. gamecube is shit so I know that the number one is ps2... and even then its still close. its MS that looses money on the consoles in the beginning, then they make money off the software (or licensing it or whatever)

0 0

#6152

Jaybo

2003-06-11 06:44

Perhaps ATI feels ripped off by making the chip for the number 3 console, the Gamecube.

0 0

#6153

apathy

2003-06-19 14:33

Well anyone who likes Q3 will always support it regardless of the obvious balance issues. Q3 is probably the most unbalanced game ever released, end of story...

0 0