#7732

neo-n

2003-10-28 22:47

Well now they've said it , it better be true !! They couldnt be as stupid as nvidia could they ??

0 0

#7733

El_Coyote

2003-10-28 23:25

EliteBastards already showed that the aquamark issue wasnt anything but a gamma bug, no overdraw reductions. the ref. renderings from aguamark developers had no difference other than a gamma reduction

0 0

#7734

neo-n

2003-10-28 23:36

yeah i know, i just hope nothing else turns up !

0 0

#7735

digitalwanderer

2003-10-28 23:45

It was true before ATi said anything, this just makes it official: THG sucks and is officially the new nVidia lapdog. :)

0 0

#7736

tsunami

2003-10-29 02:25

Did Elitebastards also explain the differnce in the UT2K3 shots? Or was that just gamma as well? It's a genuine question not a dig, incase anyone thinks it is.

0 0

#7737

JemyM

2003-10-29 08:17

They are quick at replies towards the public... I give them that.

0 0

#7738

neo-n

2003-10-29 08:46

No they didnt explain it, but someone at rage3D pointed out (i think) that the texture on the foot furture away was right so if it was an 'optimisation' it was a pretty lame one. Its just a bug.

0 0

#7739

neo-n

2003-10-29 08:47

Probably because unlike some other companies they dont treate their customers with contempt.

0 0

#7740

Hanners

2003-10-29 10:48

That's a LOD bias bug. nothing more.

0 0

#7741

neo-n

2003-10-30 10:55

EVIDENCE... for nvidia cheating LOADS, for ATI cheating NONE ... do you understand now ???

0 0

#7742

neo-n

2003-10-30 10:56

No bugs of note for me !

0 0