The Inquirer have posted a good article featuring Nvidia's Quadro4 XGL 750 vs. ATI's FireGL8800 professional graphic cards. Here's byte from their writings if you're in pro cards:
Nvidia is quite experienced in this business since along with its sinking partner Elsa, where they already made a mark with the well known Quadro brand.
ATI, on the other hand, chose a different approach to this market. It simply bought well know company FireGL with its very strong brand and continued this line with the well known FireGL2 and FireGL4.
ATI decided to introduce two cards, the high end one being the FireGL 8800 and the mainstream FireGL 8700 where the main difference is the clock speed and the amount of memory.
Nvidia renewed its professional cards under the Quadro brand, calling the latest the Quadro 4. There never was a Quadro 3, and it seems that the firm decided to follow the Geforce 4 route.
Nvidia Quadro4 XGL 750 vs. ATI FireGL8800
Nvidia is quite experienced in this business since along with its sinking partner Elsa, where they already made a mark with the well known Quadro brand.
ATI, on the other hand, chose a different approach to this market. It simply bought well know company FireGL with its very strong brand and continued this line with the well known FireGL2 and FireGL4.
ATI decided to introduce two cards, the high end one being the FireGL 8800 and the mainstream FireGL 8700 where the main difference is the clock speed and the amount of memory.
Nvidia renewed its professional cards under the Quadro brand, calling the latest the Quadro 4. There never was a Quadro 3, and it seems that the firm decided to follow the Geforce 4 route.
Nvidia Quadro4 XGL 750 vs. ATI FireGL8800
