It seems that a lot of fuss is being kicked up about the recent "P4 3.6GHz" review was posted on Tom's Hardware Guide. Were the pictures of the new CPU in the review fake? Many people seem to think so....
Tom's Hardware Guide posted a pic of a Pentium 4 chip which has caused a French site to go bonkers and claim Tom's Pentium piece is a fake. X86-Secret goes into detail about the picture, claiming its obviously not a 3.6GHz Pentium 4. Joint author of the piece at Tom's, Frank Völkel said "We don't have written, that the cpu at the pic is the 3.6 ghz version... this is only a sample for demonstration. " Hope that clears that up??
Decide for yourself...
Toms Hardware Guide orignal article:- Hot Contraband: P4 With 3.6 GHz Here is the site French site :x 86-Secret. Here is a Google Translation Googled X 86-secret.com A friendly discussion about this topic can be found @ madonion:- click here
Tom's Hardware Guide posted a pic of a Pentium 4 chip which has caused a French site to go bonkers and claim Tom's Pentium piece is a fake. X86-Secret goes into detail about the picture, claiming its obviously not a 3.6GHz Pentium 4. Joint author of the piece at Tom's, Frank Völkel said "We don't have written, that the cpu at the pic is the 3.6 ghz version... this is only a sample for demonstration. " Hope that clears that up??
Decide for yourself...
Toms Hardware Guide orignal article:- Hot Contraband: P4 With 3.6 GHz Here is the site French site :x 86-Secret. Here is a Google Translation Googled X 86-secret.com A friendly discussion about this topic can be found @ madonion:- click here
