Help
Page 1 of 1
AMD bashing, looking for high tech support
#1
triplehelix 
- Junior Member
-
- Group: Registered
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 20-June 02
Posted 27 June 2002 - 03:08 AM
#2 Guest_LOL_*
Posted 27 June 2002 - 03:40 AM
ure nuts i'll jus say that once, get a life, its a Freakin CPU, both the P4 and the athlon have alot to be desired. + hammer does suck, its a freakin 64bit chip that has propiety code in it, Code that will need to be made to work on the sucker that means Rewrites of programs, jus like the 64 bit intel chip and that sucks to, 64bits is not a good choice for the mainstream user esp because we use 32/64bit hybrid cpus right now SSE and 3dnow!, its not viable option for the mainstream and never will be!
#3 Guest_Pffft!_*
Posted 27 June 2002 - 04:06 AM
(triplehelix)
this guy BUZZ is slamming AMD and Hammer. Looking for a few good posters to go over here:
http://www.jc-news.com/phorum/list.php?f=1
and set the poor lad straight.
http://www.jc-news.com/phorum/list.php?f=1
and set the poor lad straight.
AMD was only ever cool among the verrrrrrrry broke and the desperate.
#4
triplehelix
- Junior Member
-
- Group: Registered
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 20-June 02
Posted 27 June 2002 - 04:11 AM
for somebody who says it's just a CPU, you seem to be getting a bit hot under the collar about the subject. If that's how you feel why are you even in the AMD vs Intel section?
#5 Guest_MaNtis_*
Posted 27 June 2002 - 12:34 PM
[AMD was only ever cool among the verrrrrrrry broke and the desperate.[/quote]
you are just pissed off because you paid so much money for your intel only to find out that AMD supplies faster CPU's much cheaper...... but dont worry, there are many other people who where caught out by intel as well.
you are just pissed off because you paid so much money for your intel only to find out that AMD supplies faster CPU's much cheaper...... but dont worry, there are many other people who where caught out by intel as well.
#6
triplehelix
- Junior Member
-
- Group: Registered
- Posts: 13
- Joined: 20-June 02
Posted 27 June 2002 - 02:20 PM
i just want to clarify. i was not looking to start a flame war with my original post. just looking for somebody with a strong technolgy back ground to make a good argument for Hammer and AMD. seems somebody got a bit carried away and the admin deleted all the posts. positive exchanges (even if we have to talk slow for the intel fans 
)
)
#7 Guest_Fools Delight_*
Posted 27 June 2002 - 02:21 PM
bah, I own 2 PIII's one @ 650 the other a 1ghz a Athlon Thunder Bird 1.2 and XP 1.4 A P1.8a a 2 celron's 333mhz and a 1.2ghz and even a Cyrix MII 300 and Via's change over to the C3 its 700mhz, who freakin cares about a 64bit chip all those chips above excluding MII and the Celron 333 are 32/64bit hybrids because they have SSE or 3dnow! and all those extensions do is allow 2 or more 64bit FPU units to be executed at once , there is no need for the hammer.... Not in the mainsteram, the only location for pure 64bit chips are massive database servers and scientific computers for research, the avg Joe wouldn't want one, more on the fact it can't run anything but pure 64bit code, That means Diff from the avg consumers winblows 9x or XP, and yes there is a 64bit XP version, buts its not refiend and can't really run many of todays apps.
#8 Guest_Guest_*
Posted 28 June 2002 - 12:13 AM
AMD was only ever cool among the verrrrrrrry broke and the desperate.[/quote]
then why are 80-90% of the enthusiest sites out there partial to AMD?
then why are 80-90% of the enthusiest sites out there partial to AMD?
#9 Guest_Forge_*
Posted 28 June 2002 - 06:31 AM
LOL - There is no 'proprietary code' involved with Hammer, or x86-64. It's an open standard, anyone is free to make an x86-64 CPU, no licensing required.
Hammer also executes 32bit code with no changes needed, no slowdowns. A recompile will give more speed, but no one is telling you to recompile ANYTHING. Please read a bit more and get up to speed.
www.x86-64.org
Hammer also executes 32bit code with no changes needed, no slowdowns. A recompile will give more speed, but no one is telling you to recompile ANYTHING. Please read a bit more and get up to speed.
www.x86-64.org
#10 Guest_Guest_*
Posted 29 June 2002 - 08:53 AM
[quote=MaNtis][AMD was only ever cool among the verrrrrrrry broke and the desperate.[/quote]
you are just pissed off because you paid so much money for your intel only to find out that AMD supplies faster CPU's much cheaper...... but dont worry, there are many other people who where caught out by intel as well.[/quote]
He ain't piss. He's one of the morons that believes the myth that Intel cooked up. If he was smart he would realize the clock per clock the P4 get's smoke by the XP's. The only thing Intel could or can do is to up it's mghz and it's cache. He won't admit that fact that Intel screwed up. He's also scared that Intel will get it's butt wupped by the hammer. Or maybe he's an employee of Intel. I read at Van's hardware, that some of Intel's workers have been attacking Van's Ideas because they don't like that facts the Van reports. Bite on this Intel, your going down!
you are just pissed off because you paid so much money for your intel only to find out that AMD supplies faster CPU's much cheaper...... but dont worry, there are many other people who where caught out by intel as well.[/quote]
He ain't piss. He's one of the morons that believes the myth that Intel cooked up. If he was smart he would realize the clock per clock the P4 get's smoke by the XP's. The only thing Intel could or can do is to up it's mghz and it's cache. He won't admit that fact that Intel screwed up. He's also scared that Intel will get it's butt wupped by the hammer. Or maybe he's an employee of Intel. I read at Van's hardware, that some of Intel's workers have been attacking Van's Ideas because they don't like that facts the Van reports. Bite on this Intel, your going down!
#11
DaddyD302
- Junior Member
-
- Group: Registered
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 03-April 02
Posted 29 June 2002 - 09:03 AM
[quote=Anonymous][quote=MaNtis][AMD was only ever cool among the verrrrrrrry broke and the desperate.[/quote]
you are just pissed off because you paid so much money for your intel only to find out that AMD supplies faster CPU's much cheaper...... but dont worry, there are many other people who where caught out by intel as well.[/quote]
He ain't piss. He's one of the morons that believes the myth that Intel cooked up. If he was smart he would realize the clock per clock the P4 get's smoke by the XP's. The only thing Intel could or can do is to up it's mghz and it's cache. He won't admit that fact that Intel screwed up. He's also scared that Intel will get it's butt wupped by the hammer. Or maybe he's an employee of Intel. I read at Van's hardware, that some of Intel's workers have been attacking Van's Ideas because they don't like that facts the Van reports. Bite on this Intel, your going down![/quote]
BTW I wrote this, I forgot to log in[forgot I was a member, DOH]. I must admit Intel is very smart in fooling the public it's cpu is faster, and that's all they need to know. If only the public can only see thru Intel's lies. :roll:
you are just pissed off because you paid so much money for your intel only to find out that AMD supplies faster CPU's much cheaper...... but dont worry, there are many other people who where caught out by intel as well.[/quote]
He ain't piss. He's one of the morons that believes the myth that Intel cooked up. If he was smart he would realize the clock per clock the P4 get's smoke by the XP's. The only thing Intel could or can do is to up it's mghz and it's cache. He won't admit that fact that Intel screwed up. He's also scared that Intel will get it's butt wupped by the hammer. Or maybe he's an employee of Intel. I read at Van's hardware, that some of Intel's workers have been attacking Van's Ideas because they don't like that facts the Van reports. Bite on this Intel, your going down![/quote]
BTW I wrote this, I forgot to log in[forgot I was a member, DOH]. I must admit Intel is very smart in fooling the public it's cpu is faster, and that's all they need to know. If only the public can only see thru Intel's lies. :roll:
#12 Guest_*Sigh*_*
Posted 14 July 2002 - 04:52 AM
This whole thing....gets really stupid!
"I Love AMD/Intel"....
Both are looking for your $, I can understand if plle have shares in either...but the attitude Of-Do-Or_Die 4 & against is bizzare; as a USER.
All hardware is interrelated with all other componants, run on a system; continually see weak systems from a hardware bottleneck.... Worse opinions from the Know-it- all mind sets.... That grovel in what they think they know.....Propriatory mobo owners are the worst......Had someone else set their system up and then scream I know,I know...Lolol
As for fast....AMD can run a pretty quick mile and for the those into AMD spend more $$$ time tweaking, while Intel users tend to annie up front, then do some small tweaks. But then Intel can run a ragged mile too...see some of the Forums!
I run both AMD & Intel, all rigs are optimized and have a preference for Intel...Why? Because while everyone is screaming about what CPU to use, they miss the greater picture of Chipsets which are really the deciding factor RIGHT next to a decent BIOS. Get a decent chipset/BIOS & hat's more than half the battle.....ON any MOBO, using either CPU!!!
But I'm not a fanatic, I build & use these systems; they don't build or run me and I certainly don't go nuts over someones company product!
Research, research....and finally, have fun!! :roll:
"I Love AMD/Intel"....
Both are looking for your $, I can understand if plle have shares in either...but the attitude Of-Do-Or_Die 4 & against is bizzare; as a USER.
All hardware is interrelated with all other componants, run on a system; continually see weak systems from a hardware bottleneck.... Worse opinions from the Know-it- all mind sets.... That grovel in what they think they know.....Propriatory mobo owners are the worst......Had someone else set their system up and then scream I know,I know...Lolol
As for fast....AMD can run a pretty quick mile and for the those into AMD spend more $$$ time tweaking, while Intel users tend to annie up front, then do some small tweaks. But then Intel can run a ragged mile too...see some of the Forums!
I run both AMD & Intel, all rigs are optimized and have a preference for Intel...Why? Because while everyone is screaming about what CPU to use, they miss the greater picture of Chipsets which are really the deciding factor RIGHT next to a decent BIOS. Get a decent chipset/BIOS & hat's more than half the battle.....ON any MOBO, using either CPU!!!
But I'm not a fanatic, I build & use these systems; they don't build or run me and I certainly don't go nuts over someones company product!
Research, research....and finally, have fun!! :roll:
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1