[Degger*]

What do you think about Aquamark 3 ? And post your scores over here !

[Global_Inferno]

My Score of 20,426

and the link: http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=6334811

[tigger1612]

My score is 46,368 #7 on the top 10 so far.

First time poster by the way. love W2S


#7 AquaMark Score: 46368 (CPU: 8833, GFX: 6285) FPS: 46.37 TPS: 13958 K Your Measurement
CPU: AMD Athlon™ XP CR: 2593 MHz SRAM: 512 MB OS: Microsoft Windows XP
GFX: RADEON 9800 PRO (Omega 2.4.78) CM: 420 / 360 MHz VRAM: 128 MB DRIVER: 6.14.10.6378
RES: 1024x768 x 32bit AA: Off AF: 4x DETAILS: Very High
INFO: tigger1612, 2003-09-15, "Benchmark 2003-09-15 10-33-13"

[Degger*]

Mhhhh... I expected bit more from Aquamark, not the testing itself but the bench is nutting that your eyes pop out of your head...

Waiting for HL2 Benchmark

[El_Coyote]

22.099

2000+
9500np (currently without soft9700 mod)
1gig pc2100 ram

and a shitload of stuff running in the background, that i SHOULD turn off but cant be arsed to

[Global_Inferno]

I have to say that I think this benchmark is MASSIVELY CPU dependant!

[Degger*]

My score is 46,368 #7 on the top 10 so far.

First time poster by the way. love W2S

Welcome and thank you

[danatomic]

I got 44677, which I cant really complain about too much considering this is my development machine running Server 2K3.

AquaMark Score: 44677 (CPU: 8053, GFX: 6183) FPS: 44.68 TPS: 13448 K
CPU: Pentium® 4 processor , HT:On CR: 3000 MHz SRAM: 1024 MB OS: Windows Server 2003 (Undetected)
GFX: ALL-IN-WONDER 9800 SERIES (Omega 2.4.78) CM: 432 / 371 MHz VRAM: 128 MB DRIVER: 6.14.10.6378
RES: 1024x768 x 32bit AA: Off AF: 4x DETAILS: Very High
INFO: danatomic, 2003-09-15, "Benchmark 2003-09-15 11-14-47"

[MarkB]

I dunno. It must run so fast on my P.C. that it doesn't have time to get a result.

Either that or the program is just not running on my PC. I double click and nothing happens. Does anybody get the same ?

Windows XP Pro
MSI KT3-Ultra
Athlon XP 2500+
GeForceFX 5900 Ultra
Slight Overvlock on CPU and GPU

P.S.

Before replying, please bear in mind that I couldn't care less about the whole, my ATI/NVidia GeRadeon 985900 FX pro Ultra clocked at squidillion MHz yet still has a temp of Absolute Zero is bigger than your similarly stupidly high spec card. They're both O.K so 'nuff said.

[spajdr]

i have 46461
http://home.tiscali.cz/intelp4/aqua1.jpg
http://home.tiscali.cz/intelp4/aqua2.jpg

cant post my score online,it always quits with some weird error.

[Glow Worm]

Wit my rig & Dets 51.75 = 48451
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vi...runID=140738444

[JemyM]

45.23 (official) 34906
51.45 (beta) 38777

Hardware/Software Essentials:
CPU: Athlon XP 2400+
M.B: EpoX 8K5A2+
GPU: ASUS v9950 GeForce FX 5900 Ultra 256mb 528/1004
RAM: 512mb DDR 333Mhz
SPU: Creative Audigy Soundblaster EX
SCR: Nokia 446XPro

HD1: Western Digital 120gb 8mb 7200rpm
HD2: Western Digital 120gb 8mb 7200rpm
HD3: Western Digital 80gb 8mb 7200rpm
HD4: Maxtor 30gb 5400rpm

OS: Windows XP SP1
DX: Direct X9

KEY: Noname win95
CAM: Creative WebCam Plus
JOY: 2xGravis GamePad Pro
PAD: Wacom Intuos 2
NET: 2,5mbit down / 750 up

Mouse: Intellimouse Explorer 3.0
Scanner: HP DeskJet 980cxi
Printer: HP ScanJet 5400c
Tower: Chieftec Dragon Tower Purple

[El_Coyote]

I have to say that I think this benchmark is MASSIVELY CPU dependant!

so?

benches like 3dmark03 only tests the gfx and say squat about the rest.
you relly need those combinations too, in a way, thay are better.

[Major Slaughter]

59,065

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=272541651

[JemyM]

I have to say that I think this benchmark is MASSIVELY CPU dependant!

so?
benches like 3dmark03 only tests the gfx and say squat about the rest.
you relly need those combinations too, in a way, thay are better.

It could be that everyone have only tested R9800 or fx5900, but it seems that the score is more dependant of your CPU than your gfx card, even with the best 3d accelerators on the market.

[El_Coyote]

It could be that everyone have only tested R9800 or fx5900, but it seems that the score is more dependant of your CPU than your gfx card, even with the best 3d accelerators on the market.

yet it is still described as a game benchmark, not like a graphicscard benchmark.
and yes it is heavily cpu dependant. i dont know if you chacked the physics in that thing, but it's not small amunts used.

AquaMark3 is a powerful tool to determine reliable information about the gaming performance of a computer system.

it might come as a surprise to you, but regular game actually IS also dependant of cpu speeds, just look at the latest athlon64/quakedemo previews.

[JemyM]

it might come as a surprise to you, but regular game actually IS also dependant of cpu speeds, just look at the latest athlon64/quakedemo previews.

Not *THIS* dependent... This is overkill!

[El_Coyote]

well there seems to be quite a difference in performance if i enable/disable my soft9700, so i'd say its good enough.

3dmark 2001 was very cpu dependant aswell

[JemyM]

In 3dMark you could tripple your mark just by switching 3d card...

It seems like half of Aquamark is dependent on the CPU, and the other half on the GFX card.

[El_Coyote]

as it should be, ther cpu isnt a spare piece of hardware you toss in the computer just for the fun of it.
aquamark gives a score on both cpu and gpu, but i researched how they get the final score. but im sure the banchmark is as they intended. and it gives a view of the system as a whole. and there IS a huge difference between a 2000+ and a p4 3ghz with hyperthreading. so that sould be taken into consideration too