• About Us
  • Search
  • Compatibility
  • Forums
  • Archive
  • Channels
  • Home
  • Search
  • Member List
  • Calendar
  • Help

Current time: 11-22-2008, 08:35 PM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)


Warp2Search - Your Daily Tech News Service / Graphics Cards & Drivers / Nvidia General Topics / Having fun with a ASUS GF5900U 256mb

Post Reply  Post Thread 
Pages (2): « First [1] 2 Next > Last »
Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
Having fun with a ASUS GF5900U 256mb
Author Message
JemyM
Member
***


Posts: 130
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #1
Having fun with a ASUS GF5900U 256mb

Feel free to flame me as much as you'd like for the unprofessional bits of this post. Its written during lunchtime at work, just becouse I had nothing better to do.

Just replaced my old GeForce 3 Ti500 with a ASUS 5900 Ultra. My choice of graphiccard is actually more of a brand choice (ASUS) than the chip (NVIDIA). I saved money already last year, so I kept money in an envelope for half a year until the 5900 finally eased the dissapointment of 5800.
(I have 512mb/2400+)

First up:
This card does *not* take up 2 slots.
NO. NO. NO.
So forget that issue. I even have a Titan Double Blower placed right beneath it, and if that baby fits, anything fits.
http://www.gforcex.com/frame.pl?m=artikl...stemblower

And it is NOT loud. In fact, I cannot hear it over my CPU fan anyway.


But I have taken a unprofessional look at some of the popular games around. See this as a "playability" test, rather than a perfect "fps" test.

First up. AA does not concern me. I run everything in 1600x1200. Sure, if you stand absolutely still you can see jagged edges if you focus your eyes, but as long as you keep movin, you need a cyberbrain to see any. Since "Turn of AA" is the greatest speedtip in the book, I have not messed with it much and would defenitly not destroy the experience in newer games with it.
I can understand why AA is a must for thoose who likes/must play everything in 1024x768...
But if you can afford a $400 graphiccard, you can afford a decent 19".
So unless you run TFT, or have eye problems, then a higher resolution is prefered over AA. Besides, a 19"+ is probably the best piece you can buy to increase your gaming experience.

I have also not even tried 3d Mark so far. When thinking upon it... I forgot. In all fuzz about it, I guess I just wasnt interested about it anymore. I intend to take a look at the nature demo later on.


Quake 1 (Tenebrae): http://tenebrae.sourceforge.net
Tenebrae is a Quake 1 port using "Stencil Shadows" = "THE" feature of Doom 3.
Running with NV35 the game ran perfect in 1280x1024, and I guess we shouldnt expect more. Stencil Shadows is Stencil Shadows you know.

Quake 2:
Haha. A chance to see what AA could offer with enough FPS left to be enjoyable. Steady 60fps plus here, but I really cant say that AA did anything for my experience. Its kinda one of thoose "I dont know what it is, and I cant tell the difference, but I have lots of power, so I turn it on anyway" features.

Quake 3:
As expected. Running everything at 100% went past the 60fps border a long time ago. Even with full AA/AF. Theese games are to old for this test. Wink

Doom 3 Alpha, tested with NV30 mode:
Forget it. The NV30 mode in the Alpha doesnt work with NV35. The entire game is filled up with black artifacts and looks terrible Smile

Tested with OpenGL32:
More fun. Instead of 1-5fps like before, I now reached 20-25, making the game playable up to 1024x768. However, its still Alpha. I know. I know. Judging from what I heard, that number is probably doubled in the final game. Dont buy a FX5900U just to play the alpha you hear? Listen to this wise guy.

WarCraft III:
Heh. The game ran fine in 1600x1200 with the Ti500, so it hard to tell a difference. I tried to push it up to 1940x1440 but lost the hz instead. AA? No noteable difference.

Morrowind:
It is interesting that morrowind is so 'un-optimized' for graphiccards. The greatest difference to me with Morrowind was when I swapped my 1200 Athlon to 2100... Already there the game ran fine in 1940x1440, even at large areas, but it still stagger a bit. FX5900U had near zero effect upon this. I guess a 3,2ghz is what I need.

Neverwinter Nights:
Ran near flawless before, runs flawless now.

Dawn Nude:
Yeah! Yeah! Yeah!

Splinter Cell:
Its interesting how un-optimized this baby is for Nvidia. The game has an somewhat annoying way of 'waiting' for frames to be rendered, causing a 'drunken mode'. This must be seen to understand. Unlike other games, when you look over a larger area, instead of viewing fewer frames, Splinter Cell 'waits' until all frames are viewed, causing a 'lag' that makes the game go slower when looking in some directions. Will Rock had an similiar issue.
Even if Splinter Cell runs just fine in 1600x1200 I would go ATI if SC is "THE" game in your book. If youre more interested about EPIC and ID's creations, then FX5900 is a nice choice.
This is the first retail game that put the card to a test.

Raven Shield:
UBI Soft dissapointed me twice this year. 1600x1200 was fine on GF3, but anything lower than 128mb caused heavy graphical errors whenever there is a 'screen effect' (such as getting shot).
This can be ignored for awhile, then its gets so frustrating you quit the game. 1024x768 is the max resolution if you have 64mb, and this is becouse of a BUG not becouse of the graphiccards capabilities. Tongue
Anyway, tested the game in 256mb, and it runs 100% fluid, no screen issues. But Im so tired with UBI so I probably wont play it through anyway.

Unreal 2:
Ooooh. Here's the good stuff. Against what you think by now, I am really not an action-game guy, Im into RPG's. But I do enjoy modern engines, which caused me to kept all the games mentioned above.
Unreal 2 is the coolest game available right now when it comes to graphics, and even better, the game runs spectaculary fine in 1600x1200 full-quality everything. Playing this game makes the hair in my neck stand up. It really must be experienced to understand.

Best Regards
JemyM

08-15-2003 08:01 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
kyro
Senior Member
****


Posts: 564
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2002
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #2
 

Quote:
Having fun with a ASUS GF5900U 256mb


thats it jemy .. i hate you ................. ...................... no, just kidding

hey , U didnt mentioned any screen flickers in 2D mode ... the one being discussed .. at nvnews forums.. or maybe ASUS cards are not affected..

Kyro Smile


08-15-2003 11:46 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JemyM
Member
***


Posts: 130
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #3
 

I have not seen any 2d flickering. Neither with 44.03 or the new drivers. I havnt tested any 2d games thou, but windows is solid as a rock and feels faster than before becouse my traditional 1940x1440 desktop fits better in 256mb memory.

If I see it, Ill write about it here. Though after 3 days with the card, I doubt that I will see it.

Best Regards
JemyM

08-15-2003 12:03 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Glow Worm
Member
***


Posts: 141
Group: Registered
Joined: Jul 2002
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #4
 

I'm having same pleasurably experience wit my Gainward FX5900U. games like MS CFS3, Battlefield 1942 and MoHAA + Spearhead are all running atreat with all quality options maxed out in nVidia CP and in the games.

I too have not experienced any of the flickering problems as reported elsewhere!


Athlon XP 3200 @ 2305 (11.5 x 200)
Abit NF7-S V2.0 (Bios25/nForce 4.27/FW 65.73
2x512Mb Corsair XMS3200LL (10.3.3.2)
2x80Gb Maxtor SATA-150 (8Mb) 7200rpm (Raid0)
Galaxy 6800GT @ 400/1100
TT Xaser II 6000+ Case + TT 560w PurePower PSU
08-15-2003 12:20 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
kyro
Senior Member
****


Posts: 564
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2002
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #5
 

Quote:
I havnt tested any 2d games thou,


Arrgghh :o , Jemy M , i thought U were a geek .. but u are almost not (that means u are geek .. but not almost ) .. LOL (sorry , this is coffee speaking ) ..

2D interface .. doesnt really mean 2D games .. ur normal GUI mode .. (browsing windows Xplorer, Internet Xplorer , MS word .. like that) is 2D mode .. :wink: and the flickering is reported when doing this.

There was a big thread (maybe on nvnews ) wher a Nvidia guys posted acknowledging 2D flickering on all NV 35 cards (i might be off with the numerbing here .. not a NVgeek .. just read 5900 cards) .. and he also said our rival is also Xperiencing it .he asked for help from card owners for solving this prob. Thats why i asked :wink:


08-15-2003 01:04 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JemyM
Member
***


Posts: 130
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #6
 

"but windows is solid as a rock" <- that "windows" means the things you just mentioned, did I really had to clarify that? Smile

Best Regards
JemyM

08-15-2003 01:40 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Cellar_Dweller
Member
***


Posts: 153
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #7
What's wrong with 5800 Ultra...

Just kidding...

I have a PNY 5800 Ultra that takes up two slots...

The noise thing is a joke... Even with it I can't hear it over the case and cpu fans running... Even when it kicks in to high gear... Suggestion - Get a head set... Makes for better immersion in games...

I also have the PNY 5600 Ultra only one slot...

Both these cards are awesome and run every game maxed out fine but of course I have a 21" monitor and my refesh rate is set to 120 thanks to it being a Viewsonic and might I add the best monitors in the world especially for allowing high refresh rates with high resolutions...

Of cousre I only play my games at 1024x768 screen resolutions - too hard to see things for me anyway with higher resolutions...

The only problem I have ever had with it or my PNY 5600 Ultra are that Battlefield will stutter real bad - looks just like lag on the net - if I don't turn off that damn SYSTEM RESTORE in Windows XP.

For added speed I also turn off INDEXING and do a nice fresh defrag.

My friends always die when they see my games compared to theirs - graphics wise that is... They are completely amazed...

Sorry I'm an Nvidia fanatic so don't know what an ATI card looks like...

I have a system with a Geforce 2 Ultra, a Geforce 4 4600Ti, a Geforce FX 5600 Ultra and of course the Geforce 5800 Ultra... Oh and a Linux box with a Matrox G200... LOL LOL LOL


Antec 600Plus Mini-Tower (600W)
AMD Athlon XP 3200+
WIN XP SP2
Asus A7N8X Deluxe v2.0
PNY Geforce 6800 Ultra
3 Gig Corsair XMS 3200 DDR (400MHZ)
(2) 80 Gig Seagate Serial ATA Barracuda V
Plextor PX-716A
08-15-2003 07:03 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JemyM
Member
***


Posts: 130
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #8
 

Remind you that I talk about 5900. Not 5800.
5900 is faster, takes up 1 slot, and is more silent than an average Radeon 9800.

Best Regards
JemyM

08-15-2003 07:52 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Cellar_Dweller
Member
***


Posts: 153
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #9
I knew what you were talking about...

Besided the 5800 Ultra is as fast if not faster than the 5900 in most or some tests... Just because it's a newer card, (the 5900) doesn't mean it's a faster card...

It's based off of the 5800 by most accounts it's the same card...

The reason you have more ram on a 5900 is because it runs at a slower clock speed.

That was the whole reason I went with the 5800 Ultra because of it's raw power over any of the other cards...

It is like saying that Intel processors are faster than AMD...

They are true if looking at MHZ wise but by the most part the AMD hangs right along with the top Intels and it's only 3/4 the actual MHZ...


Antec 600Plus Mini-Tower (600W)
AMD Athlon XP 3200+
WIN XP SP2
Asus A7N8X Deluxe v2.0
PNY Geforce 6800 Ultra
3 Gig Corsair XMS 3200 DDR (400MHZ)
(2) 80 Gig Seagate Serial ATA Barracuda V
Plextor PX-716A
08-16-2003 04:59 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NIKEMARINE
Senior Member
****


Posts: 568
Group: Registered
Joined: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #10
 

Even if Splinter Cell runs just fine in 1600x1200 I would go ATI if SC is "THE" game in your book


Doesnt matter what card you got fool. If you didnt run @ 1600, and ran @ like 1024, you wouldnt get those big rendering problems,


AthlonXP 2800+ Barton
MSI K7N2-L Nforce2
BFG 6600GT OC
1.5GB DDR333 Dual Channel
16x Pioneer DVD. 48x Lite-On RW.
2x Seagate Baracuda 80GB
Audigy 2ZS w/ 5.1 speakers
08-16-2003 05:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UZ7
Member
***


Posts: 93
Group: Registered
Joined: Jun 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #11
 

blah, ill just crank up my Monster 3D II Voodoo 2 12mb and ill own all of you !! :o hahaha j/k i dont even know if i have that card anymore, same with the ol S3 Virge LOL

anyway thats an awesome card, but ill just wait a while till i go shopping, maybe i wont till the 64-bit processors/mobos come out, ah well technology just keeps getting better and better, wonder what the starwars kid has to say about this LOL


Cold and Silent Blue.
Seven and the Angel.
08-18-2003 04:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JemyM
Member
***


Posts: 130
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #12
Re: I knew what you were talking about...

Cellar_Dweller Wrote:
Besided the 5800 Ultra is as fast if not faster than the 5900 in most or some tests... Just because it's a newer card, (the 5900) doesn't mean it's a faster card...


We read tests. Perhaps you should too. Smile

08-18-2003 06:26 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JemyM
Member
***


Posts: 130
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #13
 

NIKEMARINE Wrote:
Doesnt matter what card you got fool. If you didnt run @ 1600, and ran @ like 1024, you wouldnt get those big rendering problems,



Eeek... Pixel mania... Back to the STONE AGE.... Bleurkh...
No no. Get away 1024!!! get away!!!

08-18-2003 06:27 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JemyM
Member
***


Posts: 130
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #14
 

UZ7 Wrote:
blah, ill just crank up my Monster 3D II Voodoo 2 12mb and ill own all of you !! :o hahaha j/k i dont even know if i have that card anymore, same with the ol S3 Virge LOL


"This runs like half-life on voodoo 2" is a great review Wink

08-18-2003 06:30 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
beep
Junior Member
**


Posts: 18
Group: Registered
Joined: Aug 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #15
glad you love that card jemy

you made a wise choice....I myself got its younger brother the 128 meg card on friday and it's just awesome.......

runs anything i throw at it quite well indeed and get this....I'm still only using a stick of pc2100 ram in single mode on my mobo........10 days from now i'll change that DDR mode and replace it with 2 sticks of 3200 and also a faster cpu than i use now...(1700xp)...then that card should fly nice and high.......
whooHOO!!!!

08-27-2003 01:19 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pages (2): « First [1] 2 Next > Last »
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Post Reply  Post Thread 

View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe to this Thread | Add Thread to Favorites

Forum Jump:

Contact Us | Warp2Search.Net | Return to Top | Return to Content | RSS Syndication

Powered By MyBB
Copyright © 2002-2008 MyBB Group