On my machine P4/1.65GHz & GeForce3 (Asus V8200 Deluxe) is result here:

12.90 ~ 5852 points
21.81 ~ 6956 points

(Nature test scores from 19-20 fps on 12.90 to 40-55 fps on 21.81!)

AMD sux :wink:

Slam

Im Highly suspisious of your results.... I would have believed you without a flicker of an eyelid, but you are claiming 45-55fps on the nature scene??????

Can anyone else back me up in thinking this is a false figure??

Or is my new hardware and every other machine I've seen run 3dMark2001 the exception?

Actually I can back him/her up. Here's my score.=)

http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?1676332

@ What setting are you running that geforce3, becouse after looking at your score, you seem to have a 5 to 20% difference in fps to my Geforce3 ... Hell, 9500 points in wow ...

And i dont think the difference from the official(the one i run) & .81 can create a 2300 points difference ... hell, my card was running 216 clock & 486 memory during this test (a test to see its safe overclock limit/AGP4 on ).

So im verry curious how you got this far ...
I know the .81 are verry good for the nature test becouse of some fixes in the drivers, but even for me, it seem strang, the move from the 12 serie drivers to the official drivers only mode a 13 points difference, and you got a 20 points difference on your nature test ...

So im verry currieus ...

Arcon
http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare2k1.shtml?1980967