• About Us
  • Search
  • Compatibility
  • Forums
  • Archive
  • Channels
  • Home
  • Search
  • Member List
  • Calendar
  • Help

Current time: 10-08-2008, 10:50 AM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)


Warp2Search - Your Daily Tech News Service / Graphics Cards & Drivers / General Graphics Card Talk / ATI VS Nvidia

Post Reply  Post Thread 
Pages (2): « First [1] 2 Next > Last »
Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
ATI VS Nvidia
Author Message
XIII
Senior Member
****


Posts: 461
Group: Registered
Joined: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #1
ATI VS Nvidia

I have tested the Ati Radeon 7500 (64mb) on a P4 1.6 GHz and the result was 59xx (3D Mark 2000) and Ati mobility radeon 7500 (32mb) On a P4 2.8 notebook and the the result was 61xx. My geforce 2 GTS(32mb) was put in the test on a P3 933 and the result is about 65xx, the same card is then put in the athlon xp 2000+ and the result was 8xxx.

In the test i make a conclusion that Nvidia card rely much on processor speed while ATI does not. It is good to choose ATI if you have a not quite demanding CPU (1.8Ghz), If you have a fast CPU and you are an overclocker, nvidia is the one.

This is only base on the older card, iam not sure about the new one. Have any one tested both card(newer ati and nvidia) on different CPU. Please make you opinion.

1001 thanks!

01-17-2004 07:41 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Mertsch
Super Moderator
******


Posts: 3,003
Group: Super Moderators
Joined: Aug 2002
Status: Offline
Reputation: 1
Post: #2
 

hmmm not really .... you comepare two totally different situations ....
the GF2 is a awesome card ... and its well know that it needs quite a lot of CPU power to show its full potential since the card is so fast that it need to wait for the CPU .... the rule is .... at least 1gig to make the card rollin .... that gives the big difference
now the 7500 is a really sucky cards ... I mean it does not give half the performance of a GF2PRO .... this card is with a 1,x gig CPU at its max ... you can't really get anything more outa it ...



Avatar and signature by Eckpert @ Kackebeus.de
01-17-2004 09:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Mertsch
Super Moderator
******


Posts: 3,003
Group: Super Moderators
Joined: Aug 2002
Status: Offline
Reputation: 1
Post: #3
 

oh and btw .... comparing a P3 vs a XP is not a very good benchmark ... go set the XP to 900MHz and try again ...



Avatar and signature by Eckpert @ Kackebeus.de
01-17-2004 09:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Degger*
Super Moderator
******


Posts: 646
Group: Super Moderators
Joined: Aug 2001
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #4
 

A true word @ Mertsch :beer:

01-17-2004 10:50 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
KillerKebab
Senior Member
****


Posts: 692
Group: Registered
Joined: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #5
 

Yeah also useing cards that are a few years old doesn't help either.


01-17-2004 01:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
janus
Member
***


Posts: 158
Group: Registered
Joined: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #6
 

Yeah, in fact benchmarks I've seen of today's card show the opposite, nvidia's cards tend to scale better nowadays.


——
Specs:
Pentium 4C 2.4 GHz (HT)
Intel D875PBZ
2x512 MB PC3200
Radeon 9700 Pro All in Wonder & 19" FD Trinitron (1600x1200@85Hz)
200 GB HD Space (120 GB WD SE, 80 GB WD)
SB Audigy & Logitech Z-680 Speakers (DTS, DD, THX)
——
–Janus
——
01-17-2004 07:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
XIII
Senior Member
****


Posts: 461
Group: Registered
Joined: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #7
 

My point here is that have anyone tested the newer card, the benchmark i made is only an example of olden day ( i don't have them now). Because a lot and a lot people have been switching to ATI because of the Geforce FX. I like the Geforce FX 5900 non-Ultra currently, but i don't own it.

Again have anyone tested the newer card? Please kindly share your result.

Thanks very...very much. :angel:

01-18-2004 11:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Mertsch
Super Moderator
******


Posts: 3,003
Group: Super Moderators
Joined: Aug 2002
Status: Offline
Reputation: 1
Post: #8
 

mmmmh keeeee lets have a look @ it



Avatar and signature by Eckpert @ Kackebeus.de
01-18-2004 12:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
KillerKebab
Senior Member
****


Posts: 692
Group: Registered
Joined: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #9
 

A lot of people switch to ATi, thats their choice. In the end you want whats best for you, so just grab any card thats cheapest and is in roughly the same performance area you want. After that, whether the Radeon 9800 XT is better or if its the 5950, shouldn't matter too much.


01-18-2004 03:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NIKEMARINE
Senior Member
****


Posts: 568
Group: Registered
Joined: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #10
 

Actually the older radeons are more dependant on processors over the older nvidia's. Especially, if the card doesnt support hardware T/L.


AthlonXP 2800+ Barton
MSI K7N2-L Nforce2
BFG 6600GT OC
1.5GB DDR333 Dual Channel
16x Pioneer DVD. 48x Lite-On RW.
2x Seagate Baracuda 80GB
Audigy 2ZS w/ 5.1 speakers
01-19-2004 07:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Mertsch
Super Moderator
******


Posts: 3,003
Group: Super Moderators
Joined: Aug 2002
Status: Offline
Reputation: 1
Post: #11
 

KillerKebab Wrote:
A lot of people switch to ATi, thats their choice. In the end you want whats best for you, so just grab any card thats cheapest and is in roughly the same performance area you want. After that, whether the Radeon 9800 XT is better or if its the 5950, shouldn't matter too much.


how true,
since I have my 9800PRO I haven't seen any more low FPS in games for now .... and since I totally dislike AA it will take some time that I see that again
and if games now run with 120 or 122 FPS is that much equal



Avatar and signature by Eckpert @ Kackebeus.de
01-19-2004 11:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NIKEMARINE
Senior Member
****


Posts: 568
Group: Registered
Joined: Nov 2002
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #12
 

Mertsch Wrote:

KillerKebab Wrote:
A lot of people switch to ATi, thats their choice. In the end you want whats best for you, so just grab any card thats cheapest and is in roughly the same performance area you want. After that, whether the Radeon 9800 XT is better or if its the 5950, shouldn't matter too much.


how true,
since I have my 9800PRO I haven't seen any more low FPS in games for now .... and since I totally dislike AA it will take some time that I see that again
and if games now run with 120 or 122 FPS is that much equal


I think the moral to this story is, either way, if your buying into medium or high end markets, your getting a kick ass card equal to the other side of the bean stock, ATI + Nvidia.


AthlonXP 2800+ Barton
MSI K7N2-L Nforce2
BFG 6600GT OC
1.5GB DDR333 Dual Channel
16x Pioneer DVD. 48x Lite-On RW.
2x Seagate Baracuda 80GB
Audigy 2ZS w/ 5.1 speakers
01-20-2004 04:01 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
XIII
Senior Member
****


Posts: 461
Group: Registered
Joined: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #13
 

Yeah i guess that right buy waht the faster, brand doesm't matter. But i am curious to which is more CPU depandent?

Thanks for the comments Big Grin

01-20-2004 05:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Mertsch
Super Moderator
******


Posts: 3,003
Group: Super Moderators
Joined: Aug 2002
Status: Offline
Reputation: 1
Post: #14
 

NIKEMARINE Wrote:

Mertsch Wrote:

KillerKebab Wrote:
A lot of people switch to ATi, thats their choice. In the end you want whats best for you, so just grab any card thats cheapest and is in roughly the same performance area you want. After that, whether the Radeon 9800 XT is better or if its the 5950, shouldn't matter too much.


how true,
since I have my 9800PRO I haven't seen any more low FPS in games for now .... and since I totally dislike AA it will take some time that I see that again
and if games now run with 120 or 122 FPS is that much equal


I think the moral to this story is, either way, if your buying into medium or high end markets, your getting a kick ass card equal to the other side of the bean stock, ATI + Nvidia.


101% right Wink and btw that ATi is more quite ?! ... thats a lie the fu**in cooler sucks ass



Avatar and signature by Eckpert @ Kackebeus.de
01-20-2004 07:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
KillerKebab
Senior Member
****


Posts: 692
Group: Registered
Joined: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #15
 

NIKEMARINE Wrote:
I think the moral to this story is, either way, if your buying into medium or high end markets, your getting a kick ass card equal to the other side of the bean stock, ATI + Nvidia.


What I said ^^ Tongue


01-20-2004 05:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Pages (2): « First [1] 2 Next > Last »
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Post Reply  Post Thread 

View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe to this Thread | Add Thread to Favorites

Forum Jump:

Contact Us | Warp2Search.Net | Return to Top | Return to Content | RSS Syndication

Powered By MyBB
Copyright © 2002-2008 MyBB Group