What do you think about Aquamark 3 ? And post your scores over here !

My Score of 20,426

and the link: http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?runID=6334811

My score is 46,368 #7 on the top 10 so far.

First time poster by the way. love W2S


#7 AquaMark Score: 46368 (CPU: 8833, GFX: 6285) FPS: 46.37 TPS: 13958 K Your Measurement
CPU: AMD Athlon™ XP CR: 2593 MHz SRAM: 512 MB OS: Microsoft Windows XP
GFX: RADEON 9800 PRO (Omega 2.4.78) CM: 420 / 360 MHz VRAM: 128 MB DRIVER: 6.14.10.6378
RES: 1024x768 x 32bit AA: Off AF: 4x DETAILS: Very High
INFO: tigger1612, 2003-09-15, "Benchmark 2003-09-15 10-33-13"

Mhhhh... I expected bit more from Aquamark, not the testing itself but the bench is nutting that your eyes pop out of your head...

Waiting for HL2 Benchmark

22.099

2000+
9500np (currently without soft9700 mod)
1gig pc2100 ram

and a shitload of stuff running in the background, that i SHOULD turn off but cant be arsed to

I have to say that I think this benchmark is MASSIVELY CPU dependant!

Welcome and thank you

I got 44677, which I cant really complain about too much considering this is my development machine running Server 2K3.

AquaMark Score: 44677 (CPU: 8053, GFX: 6183) FPS: 44.68 TPS: 13448 K
CPU: Pentium® 4 processor , HT:On CR: 3000 MHz SRAM: 1024 MB OS: Windows Server 2003 (Undetected)
GFX: ALL-IN-WONDER 9800 SERIES (Omega 2.4.78) CM: 432 / 371 MHz VRAM: 128 MB DRIVER: 6.14.10.6378
RES: 1024x768 x 32bit AA: Off AF: 4x DETAILS: Very High
INFO: danatomic, 2003-09-15, "Benchmark 2003-09-15 11-14-47"

I dunno. It must run so fast on my P.C. that it doesn't have time to get a result.

Either that or the program is just not running on my PC. I double click and nothing happens. Does anybody get the same ?

Windows XP Pro
MSI KT3-Ultra
Athlon XP 2500+
GeForceFX 5900 Ultra
Slight Overvlock on CPU and GPU

P.S.

Before replying, please bear in mind that I couldn't care less about the whole, my ATI/NVidia GeRadeon 985900 FX pro Ultra clocked at squidillion MHz yet still has a temp of Absolute Zero is bigger than your similarly stupidly high spec card. They're both O.K so 'nuff said.

i have 46461
http://home.tiscali.cz/intelp4/aqua1.jpg
http://home.tiscali.cz/intelp4/aqua2.jpg

cant post my score online,it always quits with some weird error.

Wit my rig & Dets 51.75 = 48451
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vi...runID=140738444

45.23 (official) 34906
51.45 (beta) 38777

Hardware/Software Essentials:
CPU: Athlon XP 2400+
M.B: EpoX 8K5A2+
GPU: ASUS v9950 GeForce FX 5900 Ultra 256mb 528/1004
RAM: 512mb DDR 333Mhz
SPU: Creative Audigy Soundblaster EX
SCR: Nokia 446XPro

HD1: Western Digital 120gb 8mb 7200rpm
HD2: Western Digital 120gb 8mb 7200rpm
HD3: Western Digital 80gb 8mb 7200rpm
HD4: Maxtor 30gb 5400rpm

OS: Windows XP SP1
DX: Direct X9

KEY: Noname win95
CAM: Creative WebCam Plus
JOY: 2xGravis GamePad Pro
PAD: Wacom Intuos 2
NET: 2,5mbit down / 750 up

Mouse: Intellimouse Explorer 3.0
Scanner: HP DeskJet 980cxi
Printer: HP ScanJet 5400c
Tower: Chieftec Dragon Tower Purple

so?

benches like 3dmark03 only tests the gfx and say squat about the rest.
you relly need those combinations too, in a way, thay are better.

59,065

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.ph...=272541651

It could be that everyone have only tested R9800 or fx5900, but it seems that the score is more dependant of your CPU than your gfx card, even with the best 3d accelerators on the market.