Well it sucks that you can only post your score once in the unregistered version. Actually didn't find that out till I tried to do a second. Anyway...

Is 5702 good? middle of the road?

Ok..the 5702 must've been a fluke (???)
I was bored and decided that benching 5x would get me a good average.
Ave. 5012
lowest 4944
highest 5066

I'll be uninstalling this benchmark now. IMO - it's not a reflective of any game out now or even in a year or two. With a score fluctuation like what i've seen, it does not give true representation of hardware either. Just like any synthetic bench, take the scores with a grain of salt, or in this case a jar.
Then again, I might just keep it for the cool demo.

A few people have asked me why their score is low or if the score they get is right for their system. I cant answer all those individual cases but I want to share some results we observe in our benchmarking labs. (Remember these numbers are directly from ATI)

Use these ONLY as a guide and have fun comparing:

System:

P4 - 3.06 GHz i850e
1GB PC 1066
Win XP Pro SP1
CATALYST 3.1

Defaults 3DMark settings, CATALYST control panel on performance setting

Radeon 9700 Pro: 4772
Radeon 9700: 4169
Radeon 9500 Pro: 3571
Radeon 9500: 2511
Radeon 9100/8500: 1301
Radeon 9000 Pro: 1135
Radeon 9000: 1008
Radeon 7500: 364
Radeon 7000: 107


taken at rage3d forums CASE CLOSED!1

1300 3dmarks
1600 3dmarks o/c'd

1197

AthlonXP1800
Soltek DRV 4 mobo
512m PC2100 DDR
Radeon 8500 128Meg (250/250) Locked up OC'd at 280 which i usually have it

1663

2100XP+
A7N8X deluxe
2x512 @ 2/2/2
GF4 4600ti / 42.81

1130

Asus A7V8X, AthlonXP 2000+, 512Mb PC2700, Audigy Player, Asus GeForce3 Ti500 deluxe. Nothing OC'ed

991

3Dmark 2003 = 5654

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=153928

3Dmark 2001 SE = 18,224

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5843983

Here's an interesting twist: I have a real ATI Fire GL X1 128 running FGL 1028 drivers and Cat 3.0a DX9 driver (ati3duag.dll) to allow full hardware DX9 support (including Nature & PS 2.0):

4983

(P4 3.06, MSI E7205, 512m dual DDR)

Not bad for a card optimized for GL instead of DX/gaming!

Fastest results :

3DMark2001 - 8482
3DMark2003 - 1409

ECS K7S5A - FSB o/ced 138/138, sideband & fast writes enabled
XP 1600+ - e/ced 1450mhz
384 Crucial PC133 - Ultra/CL2 settings
Albatron Geforce4 Ti 4200 w/128 o/ced to 260/510
Omega 40.72 drivers - quality

I need some DDR...
G

4478

I've scored 1849...That's good 4 a Gf4 Ti4200

P III 1Ghz
256 sdram pc133 CL3
via 694t mobo noname
gigabyte radeon 9000 (not pro)
40 Gb western digital 7200
sb creative pci
windows xp score 849
windows me score 842
8)

Its all on my spec page in sig, but here it is again (5433):

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=118401

i am running a p4 2.4ghz, 512 ddr 333, maxtor viper hardisk,
17" Samsung LCD TFT monitor, win xp home, pro-link ti4200,
Tested using 3d mark 2003.
My total score being 1105, Is this any good? Can it be better?

3DMark projects
Result 1
Primary Device NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 with AGP8X
Width 1024
Height 768
Pixel Processing None
Texture Filtering Optimal
Max Anisotropy 1
Vertex Shaders Optimal
Repeat Tests Off
Fixed Framerate Off
Comment 0
3DMark Score 1105 3DMarks
GT1 - Wings of Fury 73.4 fps
GT2 - Battle of Proxycon 6.6 fps
GT3 - Troll's Lair 6.9 fps
GT4 - Mother Nature 0.0 fps
CPU Score 449 CPUMarks
CPU Test 1 46.2 fps
CPU Test 2 8.6 fps
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 508601959.0 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 508753143.0 MTexels/s
Vertex Shader 5.1 fps
Pixel Shader 2.0 0.0 fps
Ragtroll 5.0 fps
No sounds 36.3 fps
24 sounds 27.6 fps
60 sounds 0.0 fps
Family Pentium® 4
Internal Clock 2400 MHz
External Clock 133 MHz
Description NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 with AGP8X
Total Local Video Memory 128 MB
Driver Version 4.1.0.9
VGA Memory Clock 500 MHz
VGA Core Clock 250 MHz
Total Physical Memory 510 MB
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP