• About Us
  • Search
  • Compatibility
  • Forums
  • Archive
  • Channels
  • Home
  • Search
  • Member List
  • Calendar
  • Help

Current time: 12-05-2008, 03:41 AM Hello There, Guest! (Login — Register)


Warp2Search - Your Daily Tech News Service / Graphics Cards & Drivers / General Graphics Card Talk / 2940 dets

Post Reply  Post Thread 
Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
2940 dets
Author Message
Guest
Unregistered


Post: #1
2940 dets

hi all just downloaded the new dets..so far they were faster than the 2920's but 3Dmark2001se shitz out on the high polygon count(8 lights)
all the time for me now..cant run it to the end..
any 1 else got this problem..

win XP
via 438
2940'S
gf4ti4600

05-13-2002 10:40 PM
Quote this message in a reply
enio
Unregistered


Post: #2
 

just downloading em, will post results Big Grin

05-14-2002 04:37 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Guest
Unregistered


Post: #3
 

New 29.40:

3DMark Score 4322
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail 73.6 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail 31.5 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail 73.6 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail 33.7 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail 76.7 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail 38.9 fps
Game 4 - Nature Not supported by hardware
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 304.6 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 575.2 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 Light) 21.9 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) 4.8 MTriangles/s
Environment Bump Mapping Not supported by hardware
DOT3 Bump Mapping 44.0 fps
Vertex Shader 43.2 fps
Pixel Shader Not supported by hardware
Advanced Pixel Shader Not supported by hardware
Point Sprites 7.7 MSprites/s


And 29.20

3DMark Score 4300
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail 73.5 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail 31.4 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail 73.3 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail 33.8 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail 76.2 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail 38.3 fps
Game 4 - Nature Not supported by hardware
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 304.6 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 575.2 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 Light) 21.2 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) 4.8 MTriangles/s
Environment Bump Mapping Not supported by hardware
DOT3 Bump Mapping 44.0 fps
Vertex Shader 41.4 fps
Pixel Shader Not supported by hardware
Advanced Pixel Shader Not supported by hardware
Point Sprites 7.7 MSprites/s

My system: Pentium 4 1.8A(Northwood), Asus P4B266-C, 256 DDR PC 2100, GeForce 2 Pro 32 DDR(Leadtek)

05-14-2002 06:51 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Guest
Unregistered


Post: #4
 

Hard locked on my ti 4600 in win 2k while running the vertex shader test in 2001 se, nothing overclocked & never had any problems with the other drivers (2890 2911 2920) so i guess this is a dodgy set for w2k users.

05-14-2002 11:08 AM
Quote this message in a reply
ToPekoms
Unregistered


Post: #5
 

Asus A7M266 (bios ver.1007final)
AMD Athlon XP 1800+
Visiontek Geforce 4 Ti4600 (310/710)
512Mb Crucial Pc2100 DDR RAM
SB live! X-Gamer 5.0 Sound
40GB Western Digital HD (primary)
10GB Western Digital HD (secondary)
Realtek 10/100 Ethernet NIC
Windows XP Pro

28.90's:
3DMark2001SE - 9556
Q3(at 1024x768,highest settings,quincunx FSAA,X4 anisotropy) - 135.2FPS

29.40's:
3DMark2001SE - 9563
Q3(at 1024x768,highest settings,quincunx FSAA,X4 anisotropy) - 135.7 FPS

Have not had a problem with these drivers so far so I'll stick with them.I'll repost if I run across any problems. Smile

05-14-2002 02:58 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Guest
Unregistered


Post: #6
 

AMD Athlon "C" 1GHz @ 1,493GHz (149FSB*10)
Swiftech MCX462
Abit KR7A-RAID
TwinMOS 512MB PC2700 DDR RAM (149MHz, CAS2, 1T CMD)
Creative GF4 Ti4400 306/688


3DMark 2K1SE:

10513 3D Marks

Quake 3 Arena:

No aniso & FSAA: 146,8 fps
2x aniso, no FSAA: 127,1 fps
4x aniso, no FSAA: 112,6 fps
8x aniso, no FSAA: 102,7 fps
No aniso, Quincunx: 112,9 fps
2x aniso, Quincunx: 100,1 fps
4x aniso, Quincunx: 91,4 fps
8x aniso, Quincunx: 91,1 fps

Very happy with these results. The 29.40s also seem to fix the problem with ActiveMovie video filters with fullscreen playback (The Max Payne Intro).

Recommended!

05-14-2002 03:18 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Guest
Unregistered


Post: #7
 

Anonymous Wrote:
AMD Athlon "C" 1GHz @ 1,493GHz (149FSB*10)
Swiftech MCX462
Abit KR7A-RAID
TwinMOS 512MB PC2700 DDR RAM (149MHz, CAS2, 1T CMD)
Creative GF4 Ti4400 306/688


3DMark 2K1SE:

10513 3D Marks

Quake 3 Arena:

No aniso & FSAA: 146,8 fps
2x aniso, no FSAA: 127,1 fps
4x aniso, no FSAA: 112,6 fps
8x aniso, no FSAA: 102,7 fps
No aniso, Quincunx: 112,9 fps
2x aniso, Quincunx: 100,1 fps
4x aniso, Quincunx: 91,4 fps
8x aniso, Quincunx: 91,1 fps

Very happy with these results. The 29.40s also seem to fix the problem with ActiveMovie video filters with fullscreen playback (The Max Payne Intro).

Recommended!


UPDATE:

OS = Windows XP Professional
Q3A = 1.29h, Demo FOUR, 1280x1024x32, Max detail

05-14-2002 03:20 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Rollin
Unregistered


Post: #8
 

gonna try reinstalling the drivers onto a clean XP install on 1 of my other hdds..

still crash's in the same high poly count test.. :x

got a feeling its got something to do with the via drivers..things never been the same since i started using them :evil:

05-14-2002 04:39 PM
Quote this message in a reply
wI-OSMAN-
Unregistered


Post: #9
 

I CAN'T GET THE CONTROL PANELS TO WORK
THEY ARE NOT THERE!!
THIS IS ON CLEAN INSTALL OF DRIVERS OR UPGRADE

05-15-2002 01:52 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Chicken
Senior Member
****


Posts: 311
Group: Registered
Joined: Feb 2002
Status: Offline
Reputation: 0
Post: #10
 

Working without a problem on my Athlon1ghz, Geforce2Ti 64meg, Windows XP pro system. Tried several OpenGL and DirectX games without a prob, seem pretty stable so far.

Control panel works fine too, not sure why WI's dosn't. :\

05-15-2002 10:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rollin
Unregistered


Post: #11
 

they installed ok on my other hdd..

also uninstalled the 2940's and ran det destroyer to clean up the registry on the bad install drive..
reinstalled and everything is ok now LOL

05-15-2002 04:53 PM
Quote this message in a reply
enio
Unregistered


Post: #12
 

hmm i get better results in 3dmark but worse in real life :evil:

05-17-2002 10:56 PM
Quote this message in a reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Post Reply  Post Thread 

View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe to this Thread | Add Thread to Favorites

Forum Jump:

Contact Us | Warp2Search.Net | Return to Top | Return to Content | RSS Syndication

Powered By MyBB
Copyright © 2002-2008 MyBB Group