• About Us
  • Search
  • Compatibility
  • Forums
  • Archive
  • Channels
  • Home
To take full advantage of all features you need to login or register. Registration is completely free and takes only a few seconds.
Warp2Search.net » News » June 2006 » Windows Vista Beta 2 Performance Reports

Windows Vista Beta 2 Performance Reports

Posted by: Newsfactory on: 06/15/2006 02:37 PM [ Print | 3 comment(s) ] · 4918 views

Windows Vista is system intensive, as we knew it would be. We set out to find out just -how- system intensive it is. We run a slew of benchmarks and gaming runs on both the 32-Bit and 64-Bit versions to see how they compare to XP.



When Microsoft develops a major software product, the entire world knows about it. Vista is one of the few products that has ever received this much attention, but it's for good reason. Windows is the leading OS on the market, which leads to many people dependent on it to be a standout product. Since the first incarnation of Longhorn in 2002, the OS has made numerous alterations and cuts, namely WinFS.

In early Alphas of Longhorn, it merely resembled Windows XP with a gray skin. Since that time though, things have changed drastically, and Vista Beta 2 is nothing like the system was even two years ago. The original goals are still there, but since that time, more have been added.

One thing that each new beta of Vista has proven well to do, is become more system intensive than the last. The Aero Glass feature alone can be responsible for eating up over 100MB of ram. The OS in general is quite bulky, especially the Ultimate, which makes people wonder how they are supposed to run it at release. After a fresh WinXP install, you can usually expect near 30 processes to be running, but in Vista, that number skyrockets to 40+. Not only are there more processes though, but each one takes a significant amount of ram.

Techgage


Digg it! Del.icio.us Technorati Furl Google Bookmarks

« Understanding RAM Timings · Windows Vista Beta 2 Performance Reports · Windows Vista Premium 2007 Requirements Detailed »

Comment

intellimoo
Unregistered



#64806 Posted on: 06/15/2006 05:16 PM
Performance will be great ... because it won't be on my pc, that's for sure. lol

Comment

Tuckwit
Member



Posts: 65
Joined: 2002-09-26

#64809 Posted on: 06/15/2006 08:08 PM
It's a bloated monster behemoth. A Very pretty monster though. Sorry Vistaboys but 500+MB before you even run anything?, cmon theres got to be something wrong with that!

Calendar is nice though.

Comment

MB
Member


Posts: 26
Joined: 2004-05-21

#64814 Posted on: 06/16/2006 04:02 PM
Ugh... look at the gaming benchmarks.......... Up to an 40 fps difference even with 4 GB...

Another nail in the coffin of PC gaming...

Warp2Search.net » News » June 2006 » Windows Vista Beta 2 Performance Reports

Latest News

· 2008 Holiday ANTI-Shopping Guide: 15 Products to AVOID
· Fedora 11 Proposed Schedule
· Wine 1.1.9
· Eagle iNeo I-NA303USUE 3.5"/5.25" SATA to USB/eSATA docking station Review
· Logitech MX Air Rechargeable Cordless Mouse Review
· Nvidia Folding@Home GPU Q&A
· ASUS Rampage II Extreme X58 Motherboard Review
· Cyber Snipa PC Game Pad 2 Review
· Gigabyte's GA-EP45-UD3R motherboard
· Wise Registry Cleaner 3.81
· VueScan 8.4.96
· Arctic Cooler Freezer Xtreme CPU cooler review
· ASUS GeForce EN9800GT Matrix Review
· 4GB DDR3 Memory Roundup - Part 2
· Wolfking Warrior Xxtreme Gaming Keyboard Review
· Seventeam ST-550P-AG Power Supply Review
· Coolermaster ATCS840 Case Review
· Thermaltake RamOrb Memory Cooler Review
· Thermalright TRad2 VGA Coolers Review
· Apple Releases iPhone 2.2 Firmware with Street View, Emoji and More

Nodes To Friends





Online Users

There are currently 735 user(s) online:
Ask Jeeves, Cuil, Demi-god, Google, MSN, Sergey, Yahoo

© 2007-2008 Esselbach Internet Solutions
All products mentioned are registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective owners.
Read our disclaimer over here and our Privacy Policy over here
Managed with Contentteller(R) Business Edition, (C) 2002-2008 Esselbach Internet Solutions