Vista gaming will be 10 to 15 per cent slower than XP
Posted by: Newsfactory on: 10/07/2006 10:32 PM [ Print | 5 comment(s) ] · 2091 views
Microsoft is telling its selected gaming industry chaps that gaming under Vista will be ten to fifteen per cent slower than XP. It is because you have to load the 3D desktop all the time. It is ironic, as the same company tells the developers that the same API can do certain things up to four times faster.
The Inquirer
The Inquirer
Related Stories
03/23/2006 06:45 PM: Vista Gamers Need 2GB Plus of Memory by Newsfactory
Recently we managed to spend some time using a Vista machine. The machine had Athlon 4000+ and 2 GB of memory with Geforce 7800 GTX card. ...
10/14/2005 04:41 PM: Windows Vista Game (Shanghai Solitaire) Hacked @ Extended64 by Newsfactory
Here's a package I quickly put together, using win32 versions of bspatch and bsdiff, for Windows Vista's Solitaire application. No, this doesn't work with the Solitaire in the newly leaked 5231. Don't...
09/09/2005 06:05 PM: Game on - Fresh Vista Games by Newsfactory
There hasn’t been much word or news about Windows Vista, due to the fact that the PDC 2005 (Professional Developers Conference) is just a mere few days from start (actually three days to go!). Today...
Recently we managed to spend some time using a Vista machine. The machine had Athlon 4000+ and 2 GB of memory with Geforce 7800 GTX card. ...
10/14/2005 04:41 PM: Windows Vista Game (Shanghai Solitaire) Hacked @ Extended64 by Newsfactory
Here's a package I quickly put together, using win32 versions of bspatch and bsdiff, for Windows Vista's Solitaire application. No, this doesn't work with the Solitaire in the newly leaked 5231. Don't...
09/09/2005 06:05 PM: Game on - Fresh Vista Games by Newsfactory
There hasn’t been much word or news about Windows Vista, due to the fact that the PDC 2005 (Professional Developers Conference) is just a mere few days from start (actually three days to go!). Today...
« ClockGen 1.0.5.0 · Vista gaming will be 10 to 15 per cent slower than XP
· XboxMediaCenter (XBMC) 2.0.0 »
Comment
|
Rosco Posts: 21 Joined: 2005-02-09 |
Sounds like FUD, especially seeing who the article is coming from. |
Comment
|
jeremym Posts: 20 Joined: 2003-06-13 |
might as well get world new posted from the onion. Why w2s gets news from the inquirer over and over i will never understand. |
Comment
|
paesan Unregistered |
Even before I was about to read this, I said why am I wasting my time reading an article from the Inquirer. I was correct, what a waste. Crysis will play on windows xp. They have no clue what they are talking about. |
Comment
|
Cimlite Unregistered Posts: 5 Joined: 2005-11-12 |
What they say makes sense in a way. That's what I originally thought too when I heard about the desktop being rendered in 3D. However, from what I've read... it does seem like Vista completly disables everything that has to do with the desktop when a fullscreen DirectX game is run. Part of which explains why MS is saying it will be faster. I agree with the other comments here, pretty sure this is regular Inquirer style guess-reporting. |
Comment
|
Domingo Unregistered |
This article is right, but for all the wrong reasons. It's mainly because of drivers. XP was slower than 98 by about 10-15% from RC1-Gold and possibly even a few months afterward. It's because the companies like nvidia, Ati, Creative, etc. all had drives that were functional, but not optimized. Once people started actually moving to XP, THEN the new drivers came out that were priority 1. That doesn't even include the older games that just didn't run well in an NT environment...but that's irrelevant in this case. Give it 6 months after release and it'll be just as fast if not faster. |


