Warp2Search.net » News » September 2005 » SED displays to be better than CTR, LCD and Plasma displays
SED displays to be better than CTR, LCD and Plasma displays
Posted by: [NT] on: 09/06/2005 05:42 PM [ Print | 8 comment(s) ] · 2179 views
Toshiba has developed a prototype of a SED display in cooperation with Canon. A prototype was displayed at the IFA show in Berlin and the companies claim this technology combines the image quality and the response time of CTR displays with the thin profile of LCD and Plasma displays.
More details at DV Hardware
More details at DV Hardware
« Mini-projector Prototype Developed · SED displays to be better than CTR, LCD and Plasma displays
· Logitech's new MX610, V400, V270 and LX7 mice »
Comment
|
Ihmemies Unregistered |
#62299 Posted on: 09/07/2005 08:48 AM
CRT maybe... |
Comment
|
TSThomas Unregistered Posts: 1 Joined: 2003-05-10 |
#62300 Posted on: 09/07/2005 08:54 AM
This is 1 why I'm sticking with CRT, there's too many issues with other display types. That & CRT just looks better any time I go into electronics stores (Or maybe they just don't calibrate them correctly) |
Comment
|
Yakumo Unregistered Posts: 2 Joined: 2004-05-27 |
#62301 Posted on: 09/07/2005 10:11 AM
LCD's, TFT's Plasma's etc, don't have the contrast ratio, viewing angle, or colour range of a CRT. to the point that it makes them impossible to use for some graphics, design, or even medical applications. Carbon Nano tube displays supposedly have all the features of a CRT, if not better, but the size of an LCD, if not thinnner, lower power requirements and manufacturing costs. I posted on DV hardware asking if anyone could do a technology and price comparison between SED and CNT/DNT/NED devices, I'd really like to know. |
Comment
|
Nemo Unregistered |
#62302 Posted on: 09/07/2005 10:15 AM
I used to have the same opinions about TFT's then I tried the IIyamas, they beat any CRT into a pulp. I would never go back. |
Comment
|
Mertsch Senior Member Posts: 2708 Joined: 2002-08-22 |
#62303 Posted on: 09/07/2005 11:14 AM
This is nice but what is REALLY impressive is the upcoming OLED technology ... SED seem a good solution in between CRTs and LCDs but the real new comes with OLEDs just to use one of the values ... plasma has around 1-3 lumens per watt SED ~5 OLEDs achieve 60 and even 110 already in its beta state |
Comment
|
Mertsch Senior Member Posts: 2708 Joined: 2002-08-22 |
#62304 Posted on: 09/07/2005 11:16 AM
indeed I would also not go back but CRTs have advantages that TFTs do not have and if those can be combined to one uber display ain't that good :P |
Comment
|
Yakumo Senior Member Posts: 2 Joined: 2004-05-27 |
#62305 Posted on: 09/07/2005 01:36 PM
iiyama's always been my favourite monitor manufacturer. But the colour visibility problem is a fact on any tft/lcd. it's mainly highlighted when trying to differenciate between very small, or even single pixel areas of colour. hence it's medical implications. oh, I had totally forgotten to mention the native resolution issue!! duh, that's one of the biggest points to regular consumers. carbon nano tube, and SED, don't have single native resolutions like LCD's, everything just works and looks great the same as a CRT. |
Comment
|
Nemo Unregistered |
#62306 Posted on: 09/07/2005 02:54 PM
medical implications??? they are better medically to use than CRT's |
