• About Us
  • Search
  • Compatibility
  • Forums
  • Archive
  • Channels
  • Home
To take full advantage of all features you need to login or register. Registration is completely free and takes only a few seconds.
Warp2Search.net » News » November 2005 » Plagiarism by Anandtech

Plagiarism by Anandtech

Posted by: Newsfactory on: 11/01/2005 01:15 PM [ Print | 11 comment(s) ] · 3249 views

We (ngohq.com), are very proud of our professional conduct and ethics. We feel it?s important that you all help us fight the rude and unethical behavior we have encountered from the site AnandTech.com. Site?s like the mentioned one just help discredit all the hard work we all do on a daily basis.



We think the kind of unethical behavior shown by the AnandTech group is fairly serious, today its ngohq.com, tomorrow it can be you. Help us fight these kind of crude, unprofessional and unethical tactics so we can all prevent these situation from happening in the future.

NGOHQ.com

Digg it! Del.icio.us Technorati Furl Google Bookmarks

« VoodooPC 24K - gold-plated luxury PC · Plagiarism by Anandtech · nLite 1.0 RC2 Released - Win XP Reduction Tool »

Comment

Nemo
Unregistered



#63097 Posted on: 11/01/2005 04:24 PM
ngohq are getting paranoid... they also think they are the only people on the net who can do anything....

I could find No Plagiarism in the article, true the subject matter was similar, but thats it.

Comment

Cimlite
Junior Member


Posts: 6
Joined: 2005-11-12

#63098 Posted on: 11/01/2005 05:54 PM
I read through what they had written and I agree. I don't see it...

Comment

TSThomas
Junior Member


Posts: 2
Joined: 2003-05-10

#63099 Posted on: 11/01/2005 06:03 PM
I've had my guides ripped off & (literally) posted word for word on plenty of sites over the years so I know a bit about being plagarised.
If it's not a word for word copy there's not much point complaining - I mean I don't moan at other sites for posting tweak guides of the same/similar topics & they don't moan at me either (After all, much of the content covered will inevitably be the same).
If the point is "you" use a disassembler to view code in a specific file there's not really much ways you can write that up. PE Explorer is cited as being an unbelievable point in common - try enter "Dll disassembler" into Google & see what the first result is - PE Explorer, so is it really that unlikely they both use a popular disassembler? There's a link on Anand now, that should be enough really.

Comment

TSThomas
Junior Member


Posts: 2
Joined: 2003-05-10

#63100 Posted on: 11/01/2005 06:12 PM
Anyway, the point is I can understand being protective of your own content.
Heck, several years ago I even felt Tweak3d would purposely post up a guide a day or 2 before I would as they *knew* when I'd intended to post mine after reading a post I'd make on the matter. You get over such paranoia though  ;) Just keep pumping out good content is more important.

Comment

REGENERATI0N
Member


Posts: 52
Joined: 2003-11-07

#63102 Posted on: 11/01/2005 08:26 PM
I thought that W2S readers may stand up for us. W2S is our first website that we send news to. I believe you already saw our articles back then because it was posted here. These who couldn’t see our point, Try to look at their “How to do” line, if you read our article almost two weeks ago, you may notice it immediately without any thoughts.


Comment

bcKP
Unregistered



#63103 Posted on: 11/01/2005 09:04 PM
Surely, we support you. It's just a handul people who take to the liberty of commenting who may not.

Comment

Boogieman
Unregistered



#63104 Posted on: 11/01/2005 09:57 PM
BTW Thomas...aren't you overdue for another guide?
:) (not being smart, I'm serious)

Comment

TSThomas
Junior Member


Posts: 2
Joined: 2003-05-10

#63108 Posted on: 11/02/2005 12:27 AM
I've 2 to be posted, I sent them in a while back (I've not really the time to html or anything like that).

Comment

Juomaru
Senior Member


Posts: 115
Joined: 2002-03-29

#63109 Posted on: 11/02/2005 12:27 AM
There is no recourse except to tell your side of the story to as many people as possible ... not much you can do, unless you want to invest time and money to initiate some legal action. (and this isn't exactly a slam-dunk case by any means)

Comment

Nemo
Unregistered



#63111 Posted on: 11/02/2005 10:13 AM
Yes I see they use the word "The" in their article... I definitely think you have grounds for a case.

Yeah right...

Comment

Nemo
Unregistered



#63112 Posted on: 11/02/2005 10:17 AM
I have read both the articles and theres nothing there.

Why did you think W2S members would stick up for you? If you are wrong you are wrong.

Warp2Search.net » News » November 2005 » Plagiarism by Anandtech

Latest News

· Sapphire PI-AM2RS780G Review
· MSI Wind U100 Review
· OrigenAE T12 Touch Screen Review
· Is More Memory Better?
· Kingston DataTraveler BlackBox Review
· Raidmax Iceberg Case Review
· Antec Three Hundred vs. Twelve Hundred Gaming Case review
· Update for Microsoft Office Outlook 2007 (KB952142)
· Update for Microsoft Office Outlook 2003 (KB953432)
· Brite Strike Blue Dot Series Flashlight Review
· Thermaltake Armor+ MX Midtower ATX Computer Case Review
· Sapphire Radeon 4870 and Visiontek 4870 Crossfire Review
· Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool 2.0
· Blue Microphones Snowflake Review
· Super Talent MasterDrive MX 60GB SSD Review
· Sharkoon SATA Quickport Review
· Cooler Master Real Power Pro 550W Power Supply Review
· Returnil Virtual System 2008 Premium Edition Beta 2.0.1.7098
· SpyBot-Search & Destroy Tools 1.6.0.30 Final
· Advanced WindowsCare 3 3.0 Beta 2.6.1

Nodes To Friends






Online Users

There are currently 723 user(s) online

© 2007-2008 Esselbach Internet Solutions
All products mentioned are registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective owners.
Read our disclaimer over here and our Privacy Policy over here
Managed with Contentteller