Norton Antivirus 2006
Posted by: Newsfactory on: 11/05/2005 10:48 PM [ Print | 6 comment(s) ] · 2424 views
Does Symantec's new antivirus live up to its reputation? Take a look at our full review and we'll give you all the details.
Windows A to Z
Windows A to Z
« Upcoming Intel and AMD processors, first looks · Norton Antivirus 2006
· Quake 4 supports X-Fi »
Comment
|
FailedCRC Unregistered |
#63170 Posted on: 11/06/2005 02:41 AM
it's reputation as being a serious piece of bloatware? yes, i expect so... |
Comment
|
FailedCRC Unregistered |
#63171 Posted on: 11/06/2005 02:42 AM
damn my bad grammar its |
Comment
|
DooGie Unregistered Posts: 9 Joined: 2004-04-12 |
#63172 Posted on: 11/06/2005 02:53 AM
I actually bought this piece of crap online, hated the bloat in it and asked for a refund. The money was back in my account within 2 days. Nuff said. |
Comment
|
Ihmemies Unregistered |
#63175 Posted on: 11/06/2005 05:22 PM
I use Symantec Antivirus 10.0 It's good enough for me. Someone might prefer other solutions, like NOD32, but I don't really care, differences are so small. |
Comment
|
apathy Unregistered Posts: 1 Joined: 2003-09-26 |
#63182 Posted on: 11/07/2005 06:48 AM
The only reason norton is so popular is due to their marketing, they are the aol of anti-virus, worthless and sometimes crippling to your machine. |
Comment
|
mattross Unregistered |
#63183 Posted on: 11/07/2005 10:10 AM
I still use NAV2003, cos it's the last one that was just a good AV without all the bloat. As long as they keep providing updates I'll keep using it! |
