Mozilla Firefox 1.5.0.4
Posted by: [NT] on: 06/02/2006 07:51 AM [ Print | 55 comment(s) ] · 2546 views
Mozilla Firefox 1.5.0.4 is a stability-and-security update which also includes a number of fixes for other types of bugs.
BetasIntercom
BetasIntercom
« Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 · Mozilla Firefox 1.5.0.4
· CCleaner 1.30.310 »
3 pages 1 2 3
Comment
|
TSThomas Junior Member Posts: 2 Joined: 2003-05-10 |
#64762 Posted on: 06/05/2006 07:17 PM
Ohh, questioning ones sexuality, Masterlies must really be getting desperate to have to resort to such a response. |
Comment
|
TSThomas Junior Member Posts: 2 Joined: 2003-05-10 |
#64763 Posted on: 06/05/2006 11:12 PM
Tsk tsk, that would indeed constitute an unwarranted personal attack on both of us. W2S should ban this homophob for slandering others without proof of any kind. |
Comment
|
Nanobot Unregistered |
#64765 Posted on: 06/06/2006 02:56 AM
No, I never said that Secunia is misleading anyone. Secunia's information is laid out in a very straight-forward way. The fact that you are deliberately twisting what Secunia says to fit your agenda is your problem, not Secunia's. Learn to read and quit lying about your sources like you did with mine from day one. "I love your excuses you make. You would think that of all places Mozilla would not want to make their products look bad yet they CLEARLY use the terms CRITICAL and HIGH when they really mean something else? Please." Who's making excuses? What Mozilla calls the different levels makes no difference. The description of Mozilla's "High" level is the same as Secunia's description of "Less critical". You're completely avoiding the issue. Stop making excuses. "The CVE list is clear. I like how the number of vulnerabilities for IE somehow makes the 161 vulnerabilities in Firefox disappear. When you buy a car that has 4 recalls do you justify it being ok when you hear another had 10? Or do you buy the car with the least amount?" See, again you're avoiding addressing my main point. The link you gave is *not* CVE's list of vulnerabilities. It is the list of *proposed* vulnerabilities to CVE, and immediately I spotted several that concern extensions, not Firefox itself, and at least one that is actually an IE vulnerability and was mistaken for a Firefox vulnerability because the guy who submitted it was using the IE Tab extension. This is yet another example where you are lying about what your sources say. The IE figure I gave was just an on-the-side comment because you seem to be under the illusion that IE is no less secure than Firefox. "Just like I thought, oh looky here Opera only has only 50" What's your point? I have never said that Firefox is safer than Opera. If you think I have then maybe you need to get your vision checked. I'll go right out and say it (as I have before): Opera has a more impressive recent history of security than Firefox. Like I've said countless times in the past, Opera is a good browser, and I have never tried to pass it off as anything less. You're just so desperate to label me a Firefox fanboy that you can't stand the fact that I'm not that closed-minded. |
Comment
|
Nanobot Unregistered |
#64766 Posted on: 06/06/2006 03:16 AM
"I do have thousands of clients which is why I am able to provide REAL solutions to problems." Again, I don't believe you. What company do you work at? Show me an online resource showing your employment at the company. Don't expect people to just take your word for something when you have an extensive and proven history of lying about yourself and others. (And, by the way, you're the only person I've seen who doesn't accept the overly-thorough proofs we've collected, so don't pretend like this isn't an issue.) "Installing Opera and Firefox DOES not provide protection." I've never claimed that it makes you perfectly safe. Nothing you can do, short of severely crippling any online experience, can make you "perfectly safe". But switching to Firefox or Opera does dramatically reduce the chances of getting malware, as plenty of studies have shown. It's a much quicker solution than downloading and setting up all of the protection crap that bogs down your system and only gets worse over time, and it has other immediate and long-term benefits as well. You may think of yourself as an expert (heck, you probably think that you're God by now), but you're a minority, as most security experts recommend switching away from Internet Explorer and have for quite some time now. But you probably don't notice that since you have a long history (since 2001 as far as I can see) of refusing to hear any argument that contradicts your own opinion. You're an expert opinion holder, but that's about it. And stop calling me a Firefox fanboy. When will you get it through your head that I have always recommended Opera along with Firefox and also recommend Safari and Konqueror above IE? Depending on the person, I've also recommended Netscape, Camino, Galeon, and iCab. Your obsession with trying to label everyone who disagrees with you a Firefox fanboy is getting ridiculous. You even effectively called Opera Watch a Firefox fanboy and had to add "(not Opera Watch)" just to cover it up, even though they were the ones who created the quote you have associated with Firefox fanboys. |
Comment
|
Nanobot Unregistered |
#64767 Posted on: 06/06/2006 07:37 PM
Apparently Mastertech has finally been banned here. No need to continue trying to convince people that he's a liar and manipulator -- I think we all know. |
3 pages 1 2 3
