• About Us
  • Search
  • Compatibility
  • Forums
  • Archive
  • Channels
  • Home
To take full advantage of all features you need to login or register. Registration is completely free and takes only a few seconds.
Warp2Search.net » News » August 2006 » LCDs Images Delayed Compared to CRTs? Yes!

LCDs Images Delayed Compared to CRTs? Yes!

Posted by: Newsfactory on: 08/03/2006 04:45 PM [ Print | 2 comment(s) ] · 1740 views

Some of the readers of Behardware.com have sent e-mails about a possible risk of delay of image displayed on LCD monitors compared to CRTs. The website checked this information and found that they were right!



All LCD monitors tested were from a few milliseconds to a couple of images late compared to CRTs. Of course there are consequences: in LAN games, those who have CRT monitors have advantages over other participants. This is also true for movies: sound comes before images and sometime a lot earlier?

Behardware.com


Digg it! Del.icio.us Technorati Furl Google Bookmarks

« Swiftech MCW60-T Thermoelectric VGA Waterblock Review · LCDs Images Delayed Compared to CRTs? Yes! · Mobile CPU Wars: Core 2 Duo vs. Core Duo »

Comment

jroach
Unregistered



#65030 Posted on: 08/03/2006 11:50 PM
wow 32ms is a fair bit, I would have thought only a few ms at most.

Very interesting article.

Comment

Cimlite
Junior Member


Posts: 6
Joined: 2005-11-12

#65031 Posted on: 08/04/2006 12:14 AM
Thought this was common knowledge. Even the best LCDs are still slightly behind a CRT.

For gaming purposes, if your picky that is, a CRT is clearly better. If your extremly picky with colors, working for example with photos then a good CRT is also better. If you need to use lots of different resolutions, then a CRT is again to be prefered since they handle all resolutions very well. A LCD usally only has one resolution and then scales the image it gets to fit that native resolution. That makes lower resolutions blurry and reduces quality.

Price is another big thing for CRTs. You get a whole lot more screen for a lot less money.

The only clear two things LCDs have going for them is the slim size and the very stable image, easier on the eyes. That seems to be more then enough though juding by what most stores got in stock. It's all LCDs, some stores does not even have CRTs anymore (atleast that's how it's in Sweden).

Warp2Search.net » News » August 2006 » LCDs Images Delayed Compared to CRTs? Yes!

Latest News

· Muskin DDR3 1600 Memory Review
· Evercool Formula 2 GPU Cooler Review
· IObit Smart Defrag 1.03
· HP Compaq Presario SR5610F Review
· Ubuntu 9.04 Alpha 1 released
· Cooler Master ATCS 840 Review
· Lexar JumpDrive Solo Vault 4gb USB Drive Review
· Far Cry 2 Hardware Performance Review
· Top Holiday Games of 2008 Graphics Shootout
· Antec Signature 650 Power Supply Review
· IN WIN Na eSATA & USB 2.0 HDD Enclosure Touch of the East Review
· AMD Phenom II, Dragon Platform, and Stream Technology
· Sleek-Audio Custom Earphones
· McAfee AVERT Stinger 10.0.0.457
· Apple updates Final Cut Pro, Compressor, Color, and Shake
· The HP Mini 1000 - 2nd Generation
· GTX 260 V Radeon 4870 (drivers revisited)
· 2008 Holiday ANTI-Shopping Guide: 15 Products to AVOID
· Fedora 11 Proposed Schedule
· Wine 1.1.9

Nodes To Friends





Online Users

There are currently 663 user(s) online:
Ask Jeeves, Cuil, Google, Live Search, MSN, Yahoo

© 2007-2008 Esselbach Internet Solutions
All products mentioned are registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective owners.
Read our disclaimer over here and our Privacy Policy over here
Managed with Contentteller(R) Business Edition, (C) 2002-2008 Esselbach Internet Solutions