HD DVD vs. Blu-ray
Posted by: Newsfactory on: 05/05/2006 04:09 PM [ Print | 2 comment(s) ] · 2072 views
Just when you finished replacing all your VHS tapes with DVDs, you heard that there are two new kids on the block, HD DVD and Blu-ray. They both claim that they're the successor to DVD, and that eventually they're going to replace it completely. If you've been watching this fight from the sidelines, confused by the differences between the competing standards, keep reading, and we'll explain some of the technical details behind the marketing hype.
First, let's examine the reasons for a change in media. According to the DVD Forum, consumer research shows that television screens larger than 36? rate ?poor? in picture quality when watching standard definition content.
GideonTech
First, let's examine the reasons for a change in media. According to the DVD Forum, consumer research shows that television screens larger than 36? rate ?poor? in picture quality when watching standard definition content.
GideonTech
« An iPod that's not an iPod · HD DVD vs. Blu-ray
· Future for Vista Looks Bleak, but Where's Linux? »
Comment
|
StillCrazy Unregistered |
#64550 Posted on: 05/06/2006 03:02 AM
Neither is going to do well at first, if not ever. I read about a disc that holds 100GB that will be out fall of this year. |
Comment
|
h017ah Unregistered |
#64576 Posted on: 05/09/2006 07:34 PM
It's really bad that this article doesn't even mention about the differences in DRM implementation between these two formats... |
