ATI R520 aka X900 Specs Leaked?
Posted by: Newsfactory on: 06/11/2005 09:24 PM [ Print | 6 comment(s) ] · 5253 views
Could these be the Spec's for ATI's R520 GPU.
Radeon X900 XT-PE
32 Pixel-Pipelines 10 Vertex-Shader Einheiten 90nm low-k bei TSMC 500 Mhz Chiptakt 700 MHz (1,4 Ghz) Speichertakt 512 MB GDDR-3
Radeon X900 XT
32 Pixel-Pipelines 10 Vertex-Shader Einheiten 90nm low-k bei TSMC 450 Mhz Chiptakt 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Speichertakt 512 MB GDDR-3
Radeon X900 Pro
24 Pixel-Pipelines 10 Vertex-Shader Einheiten 90nm low-k bei TSMC 450 Mhz Chiptakt 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Speichertakt 256/512 MB GDDR-3
Radeon X900
16 Pixel-Pipelines 8 Vertex-Shader Einheiten 110nm low-k bei TSMC 500 Mhz Chiptakt 500 MHz (1,0 Ghz) Speichertakt 256/512 MB GDDR-3
ATI-News.de
Radeon X900 XT-PE
32 Pixel-Pipelines 10 Vertex-Shader Einheiten 90nm low-k bei TSMC 500 Mhz Chiptakt 700 MHz (1,4 Ghz) Speichertakt 512 MB GDDR-3
Radeon X900 XT
32 Pixel-Pipelines 10 Vertex-Shader Einheiten 90nm low-k bei TSMC 450 Mhz Chiptakt 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Speichertakt 512 MB GDDR-3
Radeon X900 Pro
24 Pixel-Pipelines 10 Vertex-Shader Einheiten 90nm low-k bei TSMC 450 Mhz Chiptakt 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Speichertakt 256/512 MB GDDR-3
Radeon X900
16 Pixel-Pipelines 8 Vertex-Shader Einheiten 110nm low-k bei TSMC 500 Mhz Chiptakt 500 MHz (1,0 Ghz) Speichertakt 256/512 MB GDDR-3
ATI-News.de
« Real Alternative 1.40 · ATI R520 aka X900 Specs Leaked?
· Forceware 77.30 »
Comment
|
egodeus Unregistered |
#61189 Posted on: 06/11/2005 09:34 PM
Funny how it's always the direct source that is credited, not where you actually saw the news. Needless to say this is fake, but of course worthy of front page news here. beyond3d and neowin seem to be the favorites to snatch the scoops. |
Comment
|
FaaR Unregistered |
#61190 Posted on: 06/11/2005 10:28 PM
"Funny how it's always the direct source that is credited, not where you actually saw the news." Um dude, what makes you think they didn't spot this directly at the source? Check the url man, it ends in .de. W2S is a german site you know... You did know that, right? 
Besides, even if the news poster saw these completely fake specs at Beyond3D or whatever, why should W2S link to someone that's linked to a story? People neither want nor need to read another news piece ABOUT the news, they want to read the news ITSELF. |
Comment
|
egodeus Unregistered |
#61191 Posted on: 06/12/2005 12:50 AM
it's about CREDITS, not actually posting the link to the ones linking. We've never seen a link to this particular site as of yet here of W2S, so I'm going out on a limb saying that the link was found somewhere else. |
Comment
|
pitr- Junior Member Posts: 0 Joined: 2004-05-25 |
#61192 Posted on: 06/12/2005 12:53 AM
These spec:s are more likely to be true me thinks... Radeon X900 XT-PE # 24 Pixel-Pipelines # 10 Vertex-Shader Units # 90nm low-k bei TSMC # 500 Mhz Chiptakt # 700 MHz (1,4 Ghz) # 256/512 MB GDDR-3 Radeon X900 XT # 24 Pixel-Pipelines # 10 Vertex-Shader Einheiten # 90nm low-k bei TSMC # 450 Mhz Chiptakt # 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Speichertakt # 256 MB GDDR-3 Radeon X900 Pro # 16 Pixel-Pipelines # 8 Vertex-Shader Einheiten # 90nm low-k bei TSMC # 500 Mhz Chiptakt # 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Speichertakt # 256 MB GDDR-3 Radeon X900 # 16 Pixel-Pipelines # 8 Vertex-Shader Einheiten # 110nm low-k bei TSMC # 450 Mhz Chiptakt # 500 MHz (1,0 Ghz) Speichertakt # 128/256 MB GDDR-3 |
Comment
|
hinkle Unregistered |
#61195 Posted on: 06/12/2005 03:03 AM
Those specs have already been confirmed fake weeks ago when they were first published. There won't be any 32 pixel-pipelines, 10 vertex shaders nor any 110nm low-k process by TSMC |
Comment
|
FaaR Unregistered |
#61199 Posted on: 06/12/2005 09:07 PM
Credits schmedits. Suppose W2S saw the link at Bob's Homemade Hardware, who saw it at Arnies Ubar Computer News, who saw it at Phat Phrag-Zone, who saw it at... You'd spend fifteen minutes chasing a link all over the web when you could have read the news piece long ago and moved on to better things. It's STUPID. Credits, you say. What's creditable by seeing a news link somewhere? Did you create the news? No? Well THAT would have been creditable. Just sticking up a weblink on your page isn't something you deserve credits for. That's just lame demanding credits for that. If all you care about is getting your back slapped for finding news you did not come up with yourself, maybe you should get a life or something. There's other things to care about besides computers and the web you know... |
