AMD Athlon XP 4000+ With 366MHz FSB?

Posted by: Newsfactory on: 01/02/2003 11:25 PM [ Print | 14 comment(s) ] · 5602 views

Update: Just click on the pic for the link.



Original story: Unika Mentioned Features: 0.13 micron process 512Kb L2 cache 366Mhz FSB Barton core?

Comment

slipstream3d Junior Member Posts: 3 Joined: 2003-04-09

#40173 Posted on: 01/02/2003 11:28 PM Huh? Any links? This could easily be faked. Or is it an overclocker's special unlocked unit? (366 is 183.33 DDR... doesn't seem a good number for AMD to go with, wouldn't they go to 200DDR?)

Comment

Filar Junior Member Posts: 1 Joined: 2002-12-01

#40175 Posted on: 01/02/2003 11:52 PM Or AMD will push some new standard like 183.33DDR or something like that...LOL

Comment

curiophile Unregistered

#40176 Posted on: 01/03/2003 12:15 AM Looks just a little bit fake to me - I've seen better photo editing with MS paint

Comment

Carlito_Brigante Unregistered

#40177 Posted on: 01/03/2003 12:25 AM Are you kidding?? I've made an XP 8400+ 1GHz FSB with my copy of PShop! Guys u must be insane...LOL

Comment

Neo_VR Unregistered

#40178 Posted on: 01/03/2003 12:52 AM Hmm, ive always known there was plenty of life left in a palomino core! ;-)

Comment

outofcoffee Unregistered

#40179 Posted on: 01/03/2003 01:00 AM (C)opyright 1999? Sure....

Comment

jfbbms Junior Member Posts: 4 Joined: 2003-02-07

#40180 Posted on: 01/03/2003 01:23 AM 1999 is the year of the copyright like in the palominos and tbred 2200+ 2400+ 2600+ .... etc

Comment

wb22gprix Unregistered

#40181 Posted on: 01/03/2003 03:13 AM 1999 is when AMD copyrighted the Athlon name...all Athlon CPU's say C1999

Comment

wb22gprix Unregistered

#40183 Posted on: 01/03/2003 03:25 AM The Palomino cores were large and square...that's a picture (fake or not) of a Thoroughbred core.

Comment

DaSnIpE Junior Member Posts: 9 Joined: 2002-09-03

#40186 Posted on: 01/03/2003 06:05 AM It's the Tbred C core, not Pal

Comment

DaSnIpE Junior Member Posts: 9 Joined: 2002-09-03

#40187 Posted on: 01/03/2003 06:05 AM It's the Tbred C core, not Pal

Comment

K6-III Unregistered

#40189 Posted on: 01/03/2003 07:00 AM AIUGB would be TBredB code. Also, week 36, 2002 makes it very unlikely.... Also, the D code would suggest a 333mhz FSB.

Comment

S2KTA3 Unregistered

#40192 Posted on: 01/03/2003 12:10 PM I'm sorry to say, but w2s sometimes give false news about new processors from amd. It's not the first time that they give a link to a japanse site, that we cant understand a word there, and therefore we cannot judge the source and decide whether it's a fake or not. Of course it's a fake. AMD havent reached a point in which they can declare the amd athlon xp 3000+ not to mention 4000+. And about the FSB, 183 ddr is 366mhz, un reasonble number for a system bus, the next upgrade for system bus from amd will be 200mhz (400mhz ddr), as mentioned by someone before me.

Comment

S2KTA3 Unregistered

#40193 Posted on: 01/03/2003 12:10 PM I'm sorry to say, but w2s sometimes give false news about new processors from amd. It's not the first time that they give a link to a japanse site, that we cant understand a word there, and therefore we cannot judge the source and decide whether it's a fake or not. Of course it's a fake. AMD havent reached a point in which they can declare the amd athlon xp 3000+ not to mention 4000+. And about the FSB, 183 ddr is 366mhz, un reasonble number for a system bus, the next upgrade for system bus from amd will be 200mhz (400mhz ddr), as mentioned by someone before me.