• About Us
  • Search
  • Compatibility
  • Forums
  • Archive
  • Channels
  • Home
To take full advantage of all features you need to login or register. Registration is completely free and takes only a few seconds.
Warp2Search.net » News » July 2003 » 3DMark 03 Performance Factors

3DMark 03 Performance Factors

Posted by: [PM] on: 07/31/2003 07:31 PM [ Print | 5 comment(s) ] · 2334 views

A very informative editorial has been posted at Aces Hardware. This will make you see 3DMark 03 in a different light, because it backs up what many have already noticed - 3DMark is far from putting realistic results from your system. While doing some research on an old 350 MHz Pentium II system, Johan came across some interesting results while benchmarking 3DMark03. When equipped with a high-end video card, like a Radeon 9700 Pro, the 350 MHz Pentium II was able to more than keep pace with a 1.4 GHz Pentium III Celeron and even a 2.8 GHz Pentium 4 in several of the 3DMark03 game tests. Perhaps this should not come as a suprise, since 3DMark03 is, after all, primarily a video card benchmark. But how much of one? Given the sheer magnitude of difference between the 350 MHz Pentium II and more modern hardware, we decided to investigate further.





Digg it! Del.icio.us Technorati Furl Google Bookmarks

« Outertech Cacheman 5.50.30 Out · 3DMark 03 Performance Factors · Windows Memory Diagnostic Utility »

Comment

Devourer
Unregistered



#45946 Posted on: 07/31/2003 08:48 PM
I hope this puts a stake in the heart of 3D Mark.. I never liked any of the bench marks & never considered them to be of any real use since they are NOT A GAME!!!! Die 3D Mark!!!

Comment

crownrai
Unregistered



#45947 Posted on: 07/31/2003 09:18 PM
Yup I agree. 3DMark is not worth the bytes it's written with.

Comment

El_Coyote
Senior Member



Posts: 555
Joined: 2002-12-18

#45948 Posted on: 07/31/2003 09:49 PM
umm you cant compare 3dmark with those games.. especially not Neverwinter since thet got LOTS more going on than just the graphics...

Comment

crownrai
Unregistered



#45953 Posted on: 07/31/2003 11:26 PM
Ummm thats the point. 3dMark DOESN'T compare at all to ANY game. It's a pointless benchmark that does not give you real world results.

In this example if you were to go by the 3DMarks alone you would think the PII-350 is almost as good as the other two machines. But if you look at the "Real World" benchmarks you can obviously see that is not the case (which it should be, a PII-350 is crap)


Comment

Urlik
Unregistered



#45966 Posted on: 08/01/2003 06:13 PM
But isn't the idea to test the video card? Not how good a system is for gaming?

Warp2Search.net » News » July 2003 » 3DMark 03 Performance Factors

Latest News

· CCleaner Slim (No Toolbar) 2.14.763
· Cyber-D's Auto Delete 2.02
· What's new in Fedora 10
· WOW: Wrath Of The Lich King (PC) Review
· Patriot 128GB Warp SSD Review
· Left 4 Dead VGA performance with 23 graphics cards
· OCZ Platinum Edition PC3-16000 2GB Memory Kit Review
· Archos 7 320gb Internet Media tablet Review
· Hardware Buyers Guide for December 2008
· Antec Veris Fusion Black HTPC Case Review
· Samsung L210 Digital Camera Review
· Antec Skeleton Open Air Case Review
· Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 1.5TB External Hard Drive Review
· ASUS P6T Deluxe OC Palm Edition X58 Motherboard Review
· ASUS Rampage II Extreme - The Definitive Overclocking Board?
· Intel X25-M SSD Review
· ZOTAC NITRO Graphics Card Overclocking Made Easy Review
· PowerColor HD 4830 Review
· AMD's 'Shanghai' 45nm Opterons review
· ECS A790GXM-A Black Series Review

Nodes To Friends





Online Users

There are currently 854 user(s) online:
Ask Jeeves, cleever, Google, Live Search, Mertsch, MSN, Yahoo

© 2007-2008 Esselbach Internet Solutions
All products mentioned are registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective owners.
Read our disclaimer over here and our Privacy Policy over here
Managed with Contentteller(R) Business Edition, (C) 2002-2008 Esselbach Internet Solutions